I hope you aren't drunk, though this is an original idea and will no doubt test your ingenuity to develop new effective designs.
Nope. Sober as can be. lol.
Okay, let me preface this by saying I have absolutely nothing against Dylan or his work, and I'm not trying to tear him down at all. I'm not gonna lie, though--I don't like this idea. It sounds like artificially inflating the value of the knives. Don't get me wrong, the knives are fantastic! I'm building a sheath for a Hatchula right now, and it's the sharpest custom knife out-of-the-box that I've sheathed yet and the handle is comfortable, albeit too big for my hands. It just seems like it will drive more collecting and less using, to me, as well as driving the price up and what happens to the people who fall in love with a discontinued design? They are left out in the cold or have to try and convince another maker to copy it or if they can somehow manage to buy one off of someone who has already got one and will only sell it at the inflated collector-value instead of the used-knife value?
Just my two cents, minus tax
EDIT: By the way, no offense taken and none intended back.
I honestly am not doing this to inflate the price, resale value or anything like that, and don't think it will to any extreme. You have to take into consideration the amount of designs I currently do and how many have been put out for each design since I started.
As an example, I've been doing the Hatchula since shortly after I started making knives a year ago. Right now it's up to number 14. At this rate, you're probably looking at another year of them at least, unless there's a storm of people that put dibs on them this year. I think 2 years is too much time to keep the same design around for a custom maker.
There is certainly a desire to see my knives hold their value rather than depreciate. I wouldn't deny that, but anyone who makes anything would want that. Why in the world would I want the value of my product to go down over time instead of my customers having the chance to at least get a good portion of their original investment back if they decide to move to a newer design? You can still have a "user oriented" product and have it keep its value also. When I buy a firearm, knife, car, pretty much anything other than food, I take into consideration the appreciation or depreciation of that product. It doesn't in any way determine whether or not that product is going to be collected or used. I understand that I'm going to use it, but if I want to move up before said product is used up, I want to know I'm going to get a good percentage of my money back. Making sure that they are limited enough that you can't find them too easily is a good way to ensure that. For me though, the larger picture is evolving, and not price and resale value.
Innovation and rethinking your own designs is the only way to stay ahead in this, or any game. I've got new ideas every day and I don't want to make any certain design forever. I get bored making the same knife and I want to do something new. Sometimes that "something" is close to a current design and I think that instead of having two things that are close together, you should just drop the old one and go full tilt on the new. I don't believe in sticking with a design until people are sick with it and sales for it drop off. That's the worst business plan a company can have. Being creative and evolving is the way to keep everyone interested and keep moving forward. I don't want people to say "that new batch of Deltas looked awesome. He's really getting those dialed in." I want them to say "His new designs are absolutely sick and I can't wait to see what he comes up with next."
Now if I was a legendary knifemaker or even a "high-end" knifemaker, I could see this as being one of the many ways to keep that collector market looking for the next good investment, but let's face it. I rarely use ANY materials that could be considered exotic and my knives are designed and priced from the very beginning to be affordable and available to the average dude. I HIGHLY doubt that there is any danger of my customers going the collector route on my knives. That would be like Glock saying that they were going to limit the amount of 19's produced to 500,000. It's still not going to make anyone think they are now pretty and collector grade pieces. lol
So the conclusion is that, while I understand your point and where you come from with it, I don't agree with it and think that it's not correct in consideration to or necessarily applicable to my knives.