The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
My thoughts.
Everyone here should pay a fee. If this were a “club” we’d all have to pay dues. Also it should cut down on the parasites and scammers.
…
Same here. I wish I knew to re use images already in my attachments sooner. Also like you a lot of my pictures were stock images that I was afraid to link to directly. So deleted the pictures and left the words. Old threads anyway.I’ve been going through my attachments and have been getting rid of some. I was at 934 images, well over the 500 for my membership level. Interestingly enough, I had plenty of space left.
I started digging into it and I’m big at posting in threads where someone is looking for a new knife with *……*. I’d post a recommendation along with an image, typically from BladeHQ. I have hundreds of images like this. This is the reason for my high count with low volume.
I’ve methodically began to delete these images, y’know, at those times you sit and stare at your phone and think, (**wink-wink, nudge -nudge** ) and I’ve gone from 934 to 780 without any loss to the forums.
I now have the option to upgrade membership and have a comfortable margin to work within for image count.
I’ve not deleted a single photo I’ve taken and posted of a knife I’ve owned. I’ve also deleted some pictures of my dogs and cats and some killer memes. I also have a lot of images that I can’t access.
I guess my point is we’ve all got a lot of trash that we can shed without compromising the history recorded at BF. It sucks and is painful, but we’re part of a community here. Let’s all quit whining and work toward a solution while Spark works through his options.
There have been 2 issues lately that seem somewhat connected and maybe there is a way to help solve both issues with a little tweaking of the rules.
One issue is the attachment quota, and the other is whether or not to delete old or inactive threads.
It seems that the consensus is not to delete old or inactive threads so that useful or historical data and photos are preserved.
What if only threads in certain areas of the forum were allowed to host pictures on the forum server (all others must be hosted externally) and likewise only threads in certain forum areas were to be preserved and not subject to being deleted when old or inactive?
Let's face it, NOT every thread has educational or historical importance.
Pictures of knives in your car or on your hat, in your cup or with your watch, while great fun, should probably be hosted externally, freeing up server resources.
Additionally, those pictures and threads probably don't need to be saved for posterity, also freeing up server resources that we all share, and some of us pay for.
Perhaps some photos and threads in certain forum areas SHOULD be saved (with photos on hosted on forum servers) so that they can be preserved and used in the future for information/education, but honestly there are plenty posted every day that are just for fun and frankly repetitive.
My 2 cents.
He's working on it - you can't just hop servers so fast, and I thought that he said search was broken because of this. I sounds like other things had to take priority.Just got hit with this. I want my money back and I'm not kidding. This is complete BS. Either fix it or refund me.Spark
You're not listening. He's special. How many times must he tell you?You were getting more than you paid for. Now you are still using more storage than you paid for and you’re upset.![]()