Hi Miles,
I actually just stumbled across your website. I love to drool over fantasizing about obtaining and working fossil walrus ivory, so I search the web every now and then and found your site. I'll take a stab at some of your questions. Hope I don't butcher your post up tooooo much with my cutting and paraphrasing, etc.
All the best, Phil
Is it common to heat treat with a torch as was done in the past? Or is this considered inferior or a No – no from a professional standpoint.
Torch heat treating is probably not very common. As Keven mentioned solid fuel forges are probably the most traditional heat treat source. As someone else mentioned though, Ed Fowler has made a lifetime career out of perfecting and advocating using an OA torch.
I want to know if there is a huge difference [in knife quality between my simple torch heat and oil quench method and more complex heating equipment methods] and I am just not seeing it [in my tests]?
Most people would probably answer yes there is difference, or at least a more predictable and reliably reproducible quality blade. That being said, it seems that often it takes extraordinarily expensive and complex laboratory equipment and methods to reveal or perceived the superior qualities. Hardness testers, microscopic photography and spectroscopic analysis come to mind. You are not the only one to say, geesh if it takes all that to perceive a difference, why bother? I would again venture, many folks would say for the confidence of predictable and reliably reproducible results...that and getting the most out of the blade steel, thus the best blade they can make.
...is it worth 3 times the time- and if it will be worth 3 times the price?
To many folks yes, and worth even more. To others no, and worth even less. Most everyone agrees though, that transparency and honesty in ones methods, no matter what they are, is paramount to being a bladesmith/knifemaker of integrity and worthy of respect and business.
My big question I suppose is if any of you who know more than I do can tell me if there is something specific to keep an eye out for or if there is a big risk of blade failure?
I suppose the biggest risk folks have mentioned, is the risk of having one's methods being misrepresented to (possibly simply via unconscious omision of facts) or misperceived or misunderstood by customers. As for the actually quality of the blade, many makers believe (with firm conviction) they could never reliably produce a trustworthy heat treated blade with a torch. I suppose it would therefore take a good deal of suspension of believe to believe other makers could/can.
I have never had a customer come back to me and tell me they were disappointed. Had many tell me how they skinned out a moose and how great the knife was. So this leaves me curious why … well why all this is such a huge big deal...forges and kilns and such?
Yup, the heat treating issue/question/conflict doesn't seem relevant to you, does it? I noticed you somewhat describe your work in other posts. It seems like your knives are to a good degree art knives. I wonder if that explains some of it?
Are my customers not serious knife people?
Well, you did mention in another post a person who hangs one of your knives on a wall only taking it down from time to time to show to others. On the other hand you refer to folks skinning with your knives too. Got me stumped.
If my knives blades were put to a test would they be off the scale terrible?
What test(s)? Those of the steel composition and qualities? That of steel hardness? That of iron, carbon, carbide and alloy constituents crystalline structure and grain size? That of ductility, flexibility, malleability, tensile strength? That of erosion and corrosion resistance? I believe all these qualities could be assigned objective and comparative values via certified lab testing.
Assessing your knives' design and construction qualities like edge geometry, suitability for usage intention, handle material selection, construction techniques and craftsmanship is, of course, another matter, although of utmost import. Seems like you and your customers are in agreement there. :thumbup:
Can I send a blade someplace and have it analyzed and learn something from the results?
It is up probably up for discussion as to what you can gained from certified lab test results. Have you done much in the way of grain size assessment in you HT steel? If not that might not be too difficult to do in you shop.
Getting some hardness testing done might be revealing. There are many places that do that. What if you tested several of your blades that you you made out the same steel and HT in the same way? If each blade edge was tested in a few spots how close to the same hardness do you think all the spots on all the blades might be? Would that even be important to you and your customers?
All in the name of we can always learn something and improve. I even have a kiln! Use it for burn out for lost wax casting. I tried to use it to heat treat blades and was not happy with how long the steel takes to get to temperature and maybe loss of carbon and scaling, and temperature drop as I get it over to the quench bath.
I have used a jeweler's burnout oven for heat treating. I move my oil right below so that's no more of an issue than with any other heating technique. I also use a anti-scale coating that eliminates that problem. You're right though it does take a long time to come up to heat.
With the torch I am right over the bath, get it to temp, put er in the quench, slam bam thank you mam done deal. Entire process 2 minutes (1/8th steel). Is that sacrilege? Some input please.
Just the slam bam thank you mam part!
