"Traditional" means traditional...

Status
Not open for further replies.

KnifeHead

Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
5,565
...and the word "traditional" comes from the word "tradition" which has some of the following definitions(as found on Websters.com):

tra·di·tion [truh-dish-uhn]

–noun

1. the handing down of statements, beliefs, legends, customs, information, etc., from generation to generation, especially by word of mouth or by practice: a story that has come down to us by popular tradition.

2. something that is handed down: the traditions of the Eskimos.

3. a long-established or inherited way of thinking or acting: The rebellious students wanted to break with tradition.

4. a continuing pattern of culture beliefs or practices.

5. a customary or characteristic method or manner: The winner took a victory lap in the usual track tradition.


When it comes to cutlery, there is a very hard lesson to learn. The lesson is one of traditions, history, and customs. I know it's a hard lesson to learn because I am still learning things about old knives and I am fifty-freakin-four!

I choose to learn. I think this forum is as much about learning as it is about sharing and showing off the various types of cutlery that we have managed to acquire. I learn something from every thread I read, rather it's "Hey, look at my antique shop find" or the 100th "Grandpa's pocket knife" thread. (BTW, I stopped learning about patina and half-stops a while back...just sayin :D )

But seriously, what prompted me to write this is there are people that come here to show us their stuff and/or ask questions that appear to be quite reluctant to learn the traditions, history, and customs of cutlery. Dudes...LOOK UP THERE AT THE TITLE OF THE FORUM!

There are lots of folks here that have more than a few hours of pouring through cutlery reference material that might know something about these things. I know that if I post a comment here in these forums, that there is somebody out there with more knowledge about the subject than I have and I EXPECT TO BE CORRECTED IF I SAY SOMETHING CONTRARY TO THE TRADITIONS, HISTORY, AND CUSTOMS OF CUTLERY. I don't know everything about them but I have studied a little bit and rely on my buds here to back me up when I'm correct and correct me when I'm wrong. That's part of learning process.

To make matters worse, there seems to be a trend among some contemporary knife companies to use popular, traditional names for their products when they look nothing like their namesake. Don't get me wrong, they are probably great knives, but, keeping the aforementioned forum title in mind, NAMES MEAN SOMETHING HERE! Please don't be surprised and/or offended if someone posts a followup comment that says something like, "That is not a muskrat...this is a muskrat" and follows that statement up with dated reference material and images explaining a potential mistake. And please, if you have evidence pointing out a flaw in a followup comment, stay with it and put up your reference material. This is how we all learn.

I've read the comment, "These things are evolving and ever changing and improving with time so why so narky on the name thing" or "Oh well, it's a great knife so who cares what it's called?". OK, let's run with that. I propose we create a sub-forum called "Whatchamacallit Cutlery". Therein you will post your various and a sundry sharpened items where you may call them whatever you like. No one will question what you call them and everyone will say things like, "that's a great trapper" (when it's really a stockman) and you'll say, "huh, I never thought about calling it that but who cares what it's called, it's a great knife". No one will get narky on them for calling it a stockman because in the Whatchamacallit Cutlery Sub-forum, all names are acceptable.

Blues and Bastid, I am formally requesting the new Whatchamacallit Cutlery Sub-forum, a veritable shangri las of knifedom where one an all may call sharpened things whatever one will and we will all be of one mind in the land of milk and honey and happiness and cleans our mind of all stuffy traditional mumbojumbo. To get in the mood for this change, I think I will change my ID to KutleryThoughts, burn incense and wear lots of silk stuff and practice saying "OOOOHHHHHmmmmmmm" a lot. :p
 
Kerry,
Very interesting :thumbup:
Yo I gotta ques? for ya' ?? I'm on your list,right ??
-Vince:)
 
Kerry,
Very interesting :thumbup:
Yo I gotta ques? for ya' ?? I'm on your list,right ??
-Vince:)


OOOOOhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.


OOOOOOhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..
 
Kerry,

I read the thread that I assume(their I go again, assuming:eek:) that prompted this post and for the most part agree with you . I have tried to learn and absorb as much as possible as quickly as possible. On the other hand I try and keep in mind that not everyone throws themselves into a hobby with the fervor that many here in traditionals have done. I figure everyone has a different learning curve, while others happy to own a traditional pocket knife have no interest in the history, evolution, terminology or nuances of the cutlery business. I for one am happy that this online community is made up by this broad spectrum of folks!:thumbup:

Now out to the shop to work on that half-whittler-congress single clippoint locking hunter.

Ken
 
. . . . Blues and Bastid, I am formally requesting the new Whatchamacallit Cutlery Sub-forum. . . . .

I'll Second that request! :thumbup: :D

I have seen some pretty comical names assigned and given to their 'new release' knives for a good long spell now by some supposedly "Traditional" pocket knife companies.. :rolleyes: Although, if you can get past the proper and factual history of the actual patterns being completely ignored in favor of silly names, then it does become somewhat entertaining. :p ;) :D.

Just one history buff's .02 cents worth, if that.


Anthony
 
Thanks for the comment, Ken. I hope no one thinks I don't have an appreciation for the guy or gal that has no interest in learning about traditional knives. If someone just likes knives and doesn't give a rip about learning where they come from and that they have names, that's one thing and I understand that mentality.
 
"You kids ain't using the right nomenclature! Back in my day..."
e7d8a6f9.jpg
 
You know Ken, if you're going to post that in Kerry's Whatchamacallit subforum, it should really have a serrated blade. ;)

Good idea , right after I attach the pocket clip and Picatinny rail for the maglite.


Kerry,

I know you appreciate everyone here in this forum. I can remember you reached out to me, very early on, with a few suggestions. If you did not care about folks here, and these wonderful knives you would not have taken the time,

Ken
 
...is that language exists for a reason (generally) and that there's a time and place for it to be used loosely and a time and place for it to be more precise.

By way of example, you can call this...

dog-01.gif

Cat

and this...

curious-cat.jpg

Dog...

...but after a while with such usage words will cease to have a particular and specific meaning.

Now, Kerry's preaching to the choir in my case since I've been pretty vociferous in my efforts to have folks learn about traditional patterns. The rewards are manifold imho.

That said, I've gotten tired of trying to push this learning chore upon anyone.
Some folks are just too lazy to learn, don't care to learn or it just plain doesn't matter to them. (They'd rather spend their time discussing whether patina is better applied by slicing apples as opposed to using mustard or going on ad infinitum about some other topic that's been done to death and is probably more appropriate elsewhere.)

As a moderator, I try to pay attention to the needs and wants of all of our members but I'll have to admit enjoying "doing more" for and with the folks that actually "get it" and make an effort to learn and contribute to what this forum is really all about.

It's traditional to value learning and to appreciate and build upon the past.
 
I def think,there is a lot to learn,a lot to know.
But there is so much,and at some point people use terms & descriptions for these knives,that it's almost like folk lore or something.

Like for instance,one person might call a certain knife frame a serpentine,another the same one a dog leg,then,again,same frame,a warncliffe,and finally,same frame,a sea horse.

How about a subforum name,"Traditionals are Tuff"
 
I'll Second that request! :thumbup: :D

I have seen some pretty comical names assigned and given to their 'new release' knives for a good long spell now by some supposedly "Traditional" pocket knife companies.. :rolleyes: Although, if you can get past the proper and factual history of the actual patterns being completely ignored in favor of silly names, then it does become somewhat entertaining. :p ;) :D.


Anthony

You know what, Anthony...I can take the renaming of something or popularizing a certain frame with a combination of blades that is relatively new. That is the nature of business and this, as you say, is entertaining. It sells knives and I don't have a problem with that. What is problematic is when names are used that mean something to we traditionalists and the meaning could be lost in time. That is troublesome. We may not realize it totally but it appears that we are battling relativism even on this forum, to a certain degree.
 
...is that language exists for a reason (generally) and that there's a time and place for it to be used loosely and a time and place for it to be more precise.

By way of example, you can call this...

dog-01.gif

Cat

and this...

curious-cat.jpg

Dog...

...but after a while with such usage words will cease to have a particular and specific meaning.

Now, Kerry's preaching to the choir in my case since I've been pretty vociferous in my efforts to have folks learn about traditional patterns. The rewards are manifold imho.

That said, I've gotten tired of trying to push this learning chore upon anyone.
Some folks are just too lazy to learn, don't care to learn or it just plain doesn't matter to them. (They'd rather spend their time discussing whether patina is better applied by slicing apples as opposed to using mustard or going on ad infinitum about some other topic that's been done to death and is probably more appropriate elsewhere.)

As a moderator, I try to pay attention to the needs and wants of all of our members but I'll have to admit enjoying "doing more" for and with the folks that actually "get it" and make an effort to learn and contribute to what this forum is really all about.

It's traditional to value learning and to appreciate and build upon the past.

I appreciate everything you said, thank you, but you forgot to tell us when the Watchamacallit Cutlery sub-forum would come online. :D
 
Kerry,
You had start this thread on a day w/ I gots a heavy head ,huh ?
I'm building tolerance for St. Pat's.

There's a couple of slipjoint knife Co's as of recent,IMO they got the knife pattern names all frigged up Just me I guess
-Vince
 
You know what, Anthony...I can take the renaming of something or popularizing a certain frame with a combination of blades that is relatively new. That is the nature of business and this, as you say, is entertaining. It sells knives and I don't have a problem with that. What is problematic is when names are used that mean something to we traditionalists and the meaning could be lost in time. That is troublesome. We may not realize it totally but it appears that we are battling relativism even on this forum, to a certain degree.

I couldn't agree more wholeheartedly here. You have captured here exactly what I tried to state in my initial post. :cool:

I will give you a quick example of what I think pretty much hits the nail on the head with proper terminology is being lost.. On another knife forum I had a discussion with a much younger member than I about a vintage pocket knife that he insisted was a Coke Bottle pattern.. Well, OK 'maybe' I said if it was produced in the last 20 or so years.. But, this particular knife was built at the turn of the century circa 1890's - 1902 and therefore it was known as a Fiddle Back pattern.. Well, he was determined and also uneducated as well. He continued and continued. Finally, I took it to email so as not to embarrass the lad and I offered him proof which was documented in several well established and historically correct knife references, not the least of these among them was Levine's 4th Ed.. Suffice it to say he thanked me in the end for the history lesson.


Anthony
 
I couldn't agree more wholeheartedly here. You have captured here exactly what I tried to state in my initial post. :cool:

I will give you a quick example of what I think pretty much hits the nail on the head with proper terminology is being lost.. On another knife forum I had a discussion with a much younger member than I about a vintage pocket knife that he insisted was a Coke Bottle pattern.. Well, OK 'maybe' I said if it was produced in the last 20 or so years.. But, this particular knife was built at the turn of the century circa 1890's - 1902 and therefore it was known as a Fiddle Back pattern.. Well, he was determined and also uneducated as well. He continued and continued. Finally, I took it to email so as not to embarrass the lad and I offered him proof which was documented in several well established and historically correct knife references, not the least of these among them was Levine's 4th Ed.. Suffice it to say he thanked me in the end for the history lesson.


Anthony

Anthony,
I dig a Fiddleback & kinda despise the name CokeBottle
Did you happen to mention to this fella,that you did not think there was a Coke Bottle in 1899 ?
-Vince
 
Kerry,
You had start this thread on a day w/ I gots a heavy head ,huh ?
I'm building tolerance for St. Pat's.

There's a couple of slipjoint knife Co's as of recent,IMO they got the knife pattern names all frigged up Just me I guess
-Vince

Right...this will help. Drink beer on wine (i.e. drink beer after wine) ... you'll feel fine but when you drink wine on beer (i.e. drink wine after beer) you'll feel queer (not in a homosexual way, not that there's anything WRONG with that) :D
 
New Rule: To save money, the "Whatchamacallit Cutlery" sub-forum is being moved off-shore and will only feature (nondescript) stainless steel (but must refrain from referring to same as "surgical", "plus" or any other previous incarnations of so-called proprietary steels).

Of course this may ruin the patina discussion but we have to cut costs where we can.

Also, since these knives will be delivered razor sharp, there will be no further need for sharpening discussion. The edge retention, as you know, is legendary and never needs resharpening.

All of the "whatchamacallit" patterns will hereinafter be described simply as pocketknives to prevent confusion. You can, however, refer to the number of blades (but not the style of blade.)

The Traditional Forum is now closed.

Kerry, you're up...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top