Better move upscale to Master or United Cutlery then...
Gaston
I'll pass on the United cutlery BudK garbage.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Better move upscale to Master or United Cutlery then...
Gaston
InterestingNot from the box, on either the United Cutlery and the Master Cutlery (they can do 1/8" notches as is: I consider 1/2" a minimum): This is because the saw tops are not angled down to the front. Many Liles sawbacks are angled down, but not the two-tone numbered Rambo IIs series of 100(!), and, it seems, very few of all the Sly IIs... (Most plain non-numbered Liles Rambo IIs appear correctly angled)
All the Lile movie knives are angled down on screen.
My Lile Rambo II was angled down as is, my Lile Sly II was not.
What I did to my United Cutlery RII is to have its sawback top angled down by 0.5 mm on each tooth by Josh at REK (easy does it on the angle: 1 mm is a bit much). This gave it an unusually aggressive action, but still you cannot expect much more than 1/2" notches on big/medium logs, 1" deep on 2" diameter branches at best: Going all around to 1/2" you might break a 3.5" log with ease, but that is the upper end. 1/2" deep notches, or an all-round 1/2" groove for breaking, is all you can realistically expect.
1/2" -3/4" with no effort is very good for a 1/4" thick sawback spine, and this value is typically only possible for the Lile design, because the blade is Full Flat Grind, making the top of the teeth the widest part. Most other designs are worse(!)...
My Master Cutlery, being less rare and valuable than the now hard to get UC (rarer than real Liles it now seems!), had its saw angled down with a dia-sharp extra coarse hone by hand by me(!): Surprisingly it worked great, but still offers no more than 1/2"-3/4" notches on most logs at reasonable effort. (I give these pessimistic values for a low effort, as I don't see the point of wasting a huge amount of energy to gain 1/4": These are realistic figures)
Bear in mind all other sawbacks are inferior to the Lile design (except one I will get to later): Parrish has a saber not Full Flat Grind blade profile (flat sides) that will bind after 1/4" (on top of a Full Flat Grind it would have been much better!). The Busse Battlesaw has trouble reaching 1/4" due to the push design. (Push saws need huge broad guards to push on: Busse only offer a narrow 1/4" wide "talon": This makes it almost an unworkable design...).
I used to think the Lile design was the best, mostly because it sits on top of the widest point of the blade. But I remember now the original 1985-86 vintage Aitor Jungle King I's triangular staggered two-row sawback as equivalent, despite the handicap of being not the widest part of the blade: On top of a saber grind, not a Full Flat Grind... (And it was a push saw!)
Triangular points in a stagger would be the most efficient sawback, provided this sat on top of a Full Flat Grind, making the triangular points sit wider than the blade: So far only one knife that I am aware of has ever offered this, the best possible of all sawback design: The SOG Team Leader (I think maybe a Kershaw also did, both being what I consider small knives at 5-6"):
![]()
If angled Liles sawbacks can do 1/2" to 3/4" at best, this above probably doubles or triples that... One downside of triangular point sawback is that pounding on triangular spine teeth is far more troublesome than the "flatter top" Lile saw design: This is made moot by the thin point design of the Lile Rambos, which mangles your baton inefficiently anyway: A flat full width spine, with no swedge, in the clip point of this design would work wonders for that purpose: I always hated the Lile point design for several reasons....
For the me the value of deep square notches, and the possible wood tinder, far outweights the disadvantages of sawbacks. On the flip side, the downsides of batoning outweight the good in my view, which is why the inferior design of the Rambo's point doesn't bother me as much. I would like a more versatile and rational point design, but it is not a deal breaker.
At the other end of the spectrum, the broad and heavy point of the GSO-10 did make a quite favourable impression on me, except for the annoyance of having to lay the knife down on the ground because it won't stick...
Gaston
Many Liles sawbacks are angled down, but not the two-tone numbered Rambo IIs series of 100(!), and, it seems, very few of all the Sly IIs...
My Sly II sawback was angled down. Curious, of ALL the Sly IIs made, probably over 1000, how many have you personally inspected to make a statement like this?
The guys that make the RAT know a bit about quality budget knives but I don't think I'd want to carry anything Red Jacket branded.Red Jacket Firearms RJF 1911 Folding Utility Knife
- Custom patented pistol-grip design
- 8" total length
- 3.5" drop-point blade
- AUS-8a blade steel
- Ambidextrous thumb stud
- 4-way pocket clip position
- Lanyard
This is a MUCH better knife than the Rat. I sold my Rat, it was a good knife, but to me it was not that impressive. If you had one ( RJF 1911 ) you would understand why. It is the same people that bring you the Rat. The way it fits your hand in any grip is amazing.The guys that make the RAT know a bit about quality budget knives but I don't think I'd want to carry anything Red Jacket branded.