The conversation leans to self defense. IMHO, just putting up a fight is going to deter a lot of one-on-one confrontations. It gets down to a paper-scissor-rock game. The one person I know who was mugged was grabbed by three guys with a baseball bat, which you can't do much about-- they came up behind him. Even a gun would have been useless and they frisked him, so they probably would have gotten the gun too.
Of course there was something he could do. I mean, was he dealing with
ninjas? When I was a Courier, I went to Shock Trauma in Baltimore to pick up a set of kidneys that they just removed from a deceased car accident victim and they generally had to go across town to Johns Hopkins for tissue typing, etc., and because we did so much organ and blood pick-ups and deliveries, I was allowed to park out front. I watched this guy in a lab coat walk across the street without a care in the world at night. He was looking at the road and was almost hit by a car for his trouble. I followed him in through the vestibule area and walked up to the guard behind the desk and just verified where I had to go and I asked him, "Who is that guy?" Turned out the guy walking across the road that was almost hit by the car was a top-notch trauma surgeon.
In an OR with a 9mm round in your chest, you want that guy, but some of these people even though they deal with the remnants of violence in their every day life, it's their business, they have their head up their ass, they have blind spots in life because they have no personal awareness. This is the same type of lifestyle that allows three guys on a city street to walk up behind someone with a
baseball bat, of all damned things, and have a successful robbery.
Remember the thread,
"Redundancy: Cautionary or Paranoid?" Nothing would have helped your friend because he was every bit as careless as a person that enters the woods without basic essentials for survival...you know, then they have to be "rescued." I cited the defensive driving model for living your life in whatever environment you find yourself in. We would criticize someone who ignored all of the warning signs of an impending bear attack like being in close proximity to a bear cub. Yet, when it comes to being basically surrounded by predatory human beings, we give people a pass all of the time.
If people are not going to cultivate the mindset that they are basically living in an environment filled with
land sharks, then they shouldn't be carrying any type of weapon because it's pointless and a liability to everyone around them.
Now, walking around a corner and being confronted with three guys and they have any number of various weapons is another story, you maneuver around them and then you act accordingly based on their actions in the situation.
Urban survival has a lot of different skills, it's like walking down a trail and not paying attention to sounds that might signify that a bear is close by or not paying attention to the fact that you have a bear cub 30 yards in front of you...where is the mother?
I wrote this short article...probably around 2000? Don't remember, a few helpful tips and tricks can be found there:
http://www.donrearic.com/environment.html
I don't carry a firearm, but it is the first thing that comes to mind for urban self defense. Handling situations like roving gangs of teenagers is the most difficult situation I can think of and a firearm would be my weapon of choice there -- I can't run very fast!
It's not always wise to turn your back and run when confronted with one attacker, let alone several. The concealed handgun is the King of Street Self-defense even though edged and impact weapons are definitely viable alternatives even though they will leave you at a disadvantage in some circumstances.
Other than that, pepper spray comes to mind-- no contact, works past arm's reach, cheap and light. Your local laws may vary.
If you carry it, you should consider it only as a means to use unarmed combat on an attacker because you can never rely on it actually stopping a violent attacker. If it does, great!
All of your further thoughts on civil unrest and disaster situations with tools to confront those problems are great.
- 750.227. (1) A person shall not carry a dagger, dirk,
stiletto, a double-edged nonfolding stabbing instrument of
any length, or any dangerous weapon, except a hunting
knife adapted and carried as such, concealed on or about
his or her person, or whether concealed or otherwise in
any vehicle... except in his or her dwelling house [or]
place of business... (3) A person who violates this
section is guilty of a felony...
The way it was explained to me was, "adapted and carried as such" means one would have to be hunting in order to make it legal. If you aren't carrying it as a hunting knife, you shouldn't be carrying it.
Of course the person that explained it to me could be misinterpreting it. I'll look further into it.
It's always a can of worms with these laws. A lot of people in law enforcement would consider something like an Al Mar SERE 2000 to be double edged because it has a swedge.
What is "concealed?" Depends on who you talk to. The pocket clip being visible in some places means it's not concealed but arguments have been made against that as well.
You're right, if you're carrying one CONCEALED it must be a hunting knife adapted and carried as such. This is an affirmative defense, meaning the burden to prove this fact is on the defendant and not the prosecution. However if the knife is not concealed, you're good to go.
I think what the original poster was pointing out was the fact that you're still going to get hassled by a lot of law enforcement personnel anyway, even if it is legal.
Several friends and family members are LEO's and I've been told that knife charges are usually secondary to other offenses. Just never refer to your knive(s) as weapons or say they are for self defense. They've all told me not to worry about the knife I was carrying as long as I wasn't committing any crimes.
Yes, and that tells you the truth of the situation people in many jurisdictions face, self-defense is legal only if you use government approved devices. In some areas that don't have "shall issue" concealed carry permits, that means you basically have the right to use your bare hands against knives, clubs and guns. The country is littered with a hodge-podge of vague and stupid laws scribbled by control freaks and idiots.
If you carry a knife and you cannot say you carry it for self-defense they are basically telling you that self-defense is illegal, especially in areas where it is impossible to obtain a handgun permit. If really had the right to defend yourself, you should be able to do it with whatever you have at hand. Since self-defense is supposed to be legal, why should it matter if you are carrying some type of knife that is otherwise legal? The information you have been given is correct and it's sad, i.e., even if you are carrying a "legal knife," if you should make the mistake of telling the TRUTH about self-defense being one of the reasons why you carry it, you might get arrested.