Synov
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2023
- Messages
- 1,122
I don't really understand your point. Slicing an apple and moving on is precisely what I said to do. Most criminal lawyers will say the same. Unless you are certain that talking to the police will result in a better outcome, you generally shouldn't. The police may be friendly and not want to disrupt your life, or they may be approaching you with the intent to do some kind of enforcement action. If the former, then the only negative to not talking is perhaps offending a nice officer who just wants to talk. If the latter, then there is no downside to not talking, and it can only help you in court. Most people are not going to be able to do this analysis on the fly while under the stress of being approached by police, which is why attorneys recommend you don't talk.This is true in theory. However, the journey still has a cost. It's like how you could sue someone who violated your rights and you might win. You'll still need to have gone through the ordeal in the first place. Then you'll need to invest however much time, energy, and/or money in pursuing the case. Yes, you might be compensated in such a way that would cover your costs and you might even walk away with a tidy settlement. However, you can't count on that. Opposing counsel can be dishonest, corrupt, or just blindly good at their job. Judges can be biased, crazy, or just having a bad day. Sure, you could appeal but look how much of your life has now been spent versus just slicing an apple and moving on with your life.