- Joined
- Mar 15, 2000
- Messages
- 45,835
norcal, seeing you've been around only a few months, I realize you may not be aware that noss4's methods are controversial to some, in part because the way he throws around the word "testing." A lot of early criticism stemmed from the fact that his sample for each knife is exactly one (1). In addition, his methods weren't/aren't entirely consistent from knife to knife (though he's gotten somewhat better in this regard). Moreover, force applied isn't measured in the blows he imparts. People are also put off by the silly mask he wears, since he seems to hide in anonymity. At least Cliff Stamp put his face out there.
I've never been all that invested in the Cliff Stamp/noss4 school of beat it till it breaks. Many point out that such "testing" can be more damaging to companies than helpful to users. If it breaks, it's not worth owning, right? Still, I'll admit I watched with interest noss4's repeated attempts to break the FFBM.
Thread etiquette notwithstanding, I just wanted you to understand a little better where Rat was probably coming from with his reply. My guess is that it wasn't aimed directly at you, but moreso at noss4. At least at first...
I've never been all that invested in the Cliff Stamp/noss4 school of beat it till it breaks. Many point out that such "testing" can be more damaging to companies than helpful to users. If it breaks, it's not worth owning, right? Still, I'll admit I watched with interest noss4's repeated attempts to break the FFBM.
Thread etiquette notwithstanding, I just wanted you to understand a little better where Rat was probably coming from with his reply. My guess is that it wasn't aimed directly at you, but moreso at noss4. At least at first...

Last edited: