The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
I don't really think you've spent 40 years using knives without prying.
Will,
I think it's reasonable to see some folks take a defensive attitude towards their favorite brand. And this being the Spyderco forum, it's par for the course.
I am surprised that the VG-10 blade broke rather than bend. When I first read your post, I thought you were referring to the S30V version. Perhaps being full flat ground, it was too thin to take much lateral force. It sucks that one of your high-dollar knives got ruined. It's a hard lesson learned and I hope others learn from it, so thanks for sharing your experience. I rather read about it than having to go through it myself.
I hope the responses here didn't sour how you feel about Spydies and the folks that love 'em. Sometimes, we feel like we belong to a family.![]()
Don't know the context about the statement that it is too costly to repair knives, but other firms do not find it too expensive. In comparison, Benchmade two years ago replaced the ATS34 blade in a Spike (out of production for at least 8 years) for $25. Blade replacement was what Mr. York was requesting.
This has become an exercise in rhetoric, in the worst sort of sense. I am not playing fan-boy. It's just that I walk around with two feet on the ground and both eyes open. It is fair, reasonable and commercially customary, in the case of a discontinued item, to replace it with an equivalent new product or cash of equal value. If you manage to get better, you are ahead and that's great - but to expect that, from anyone, is unrealistic and unfair.
I think you must still be missing the fact that Spyderco DID NOT OFFER TO REPLACE THE KNIFE WITH A NEW PRODUCT OR CASH OF EQUAL VALUE. The reference to the warranty replacement policy, if you will read the email again, begins with the word "If". I had already been told the warranty replacement would only be offered if I sent in the knife and it was determined that the blade or the steel was defective in some way. As I said, I don't believe that was the case. And only "IF" it were the case would the warranty apply. After being told this is the policy in so many words, spending additional money to send the knife in and wait to be told the blade and steel were of acceptable quality would be a waste of money, IMO.
You are in effect determining the warranty for yourself. It you won't send it in so they can look at it, then there really isn't a point to complaining about it.
Did you expect them to offer to replace it? You keep bringing this issue up. If cost isn't an issue, why not simply buy a new one? If you admit to in your view abusing it beyond the warranty then why are you now complaining about the warranty?
Don't know the context about the statement that it is too costly to repair knives, but other firms do not find it too expensive. In comparison, Benchmade two years ago replaced the ATS34 blade in a Spike (out of production for at least 8 years) for $25. Blade replacement was what Mr. York was requesting.