to Chopsticks
> No, in MMA competitions the fighters use a lot of arts that come from Asia...
I never really said the opposite.
>Nearly every single striking move used is present in Thailand's Muay Thai, including boxing techniques.
so? "is present" doesn't mean much, does it? Thai boxing is a very effective style, but it's a completely different breed from western boxing.
>Jiu-jitsu gave rise to Brazilian jiu-jitsu, which is used pretty often too.
so? How much of original jiu-jitsu is actually used in MMA? How well would a pure JJ practitioner fair in an NHB fight?
>Western arts = more worthy?
I never worded it this way - the word "more" is your illusion.
>I don't think so. Even the wrestlers have to learn how to take and give leg kicks and stuff from Eastern martial arts.
By the way, you are not even completely accurate here: wrestlers don't really do it the same way. Their objective is different - to close in.
Please. In the original post I didn't even mean to talk down Eastern MA-s - I didn't mention them at all, and no comparison was supposed to be implied. However - thanks to you - I moderately feel like doing so now: west may not have much in terms of quantity, but at least I can't think of a western art that lost it's aura and got humiliated in octagon - while I can certainly name few eastern arts that did exactly that. Yes, there are thai boxing, judo, and kyokushinkai - all worthy taking up. There are also fancy styles of karate and kung-fu, all with long, hardly pronounced names, and practicioners who got beaten up by ex-bodybilders with beer bellies.
Wax in, wax out, grasshopper.