- Joined
- Jan 26, 2006
- Messages
- 784
Sorry this is so long!
I have been reading all the posts about heat treating, and I have learned a lot, not enough but Im a lot further than when I started actually reading the forums. I am now able to read Kevin Cashens posts on HT without getting a head ache. Do I still know what hes talking about? No! But not from his lack of trying . Im just not that smart.
So at any rate I agree with him that the high dollar quenching oils are the best he makes a great case for them. I cant afford them nor can I justify them at this point because my knives arent good enough to warrant spending that kind of money. So Kevin I promise when I can I will buy the good stuff!
In all the posts other makers chime in and state that their method of quenching in everything from water, ATF, mineral oil, used motor oil, canola oil, vegetable oil, to tears of a virgin all work just fine.
What does this actually mean in the overall picture? There are guys out there making knives that cut through brass rods, chop down trees, shave the hair off a woman from north Dakota, but they are not using the high dollar quenching oils. How can this be if their using inferior quenchents?
It makes me wonder. I understand that the better quenching oils will get the most out of the blades with the right HT method. But if you take two identical blades same heat treat methods but quench one in parks or aaa oil and the other in mineral oil would there be that huge of a difference?
What would be the numerical difference on a scale of one to ten? One being poorest and ten being the best?
Its hard to understand it all. In actual performance how much do you really gain? Is there a difference in practical performance? Or is it all just theory?
I dont know enough to have an opinion, but the information is somewhat confusing. There is no real consensus.
So what works just fine?
jake
I have been reading all the posts about heat treating, and I have learned a lot, not enough but Im a lot further than when I started actually reading the forums. I am now able to read Kevin Cashens posts on HT without getting a head ache. Do I still know what hes talking about? No! But not from his lack of trying . Im just not that smart.
So at any rate I agree with him that the high dollar quenching oils are the best he makes a great case for them. I cant afford them nor can I justify them at this point because my knives arent good enough to warrant spending that kind of money. So Kevin I promise when I can I will buy the good stuff!
In all the posts other makers chime in and state that their method of quenching in everything from water, ATF, mineral oil, used motor oil, canola oil, vegetable oil, to tears of a virgin all work just fine.
What does this actually mean in the overall picture? There are guys out there making knives that cut through brass rods, chop down trees, shave the hair off a woman from north Dakota, but they are not using the high dollar quenching oils. How can this be if their using inferior quenchents?
It makes me wonder. I understand that the better quenching oils will get the most out of the blades with the right HT method. But if you take two identical blades same heat treat methods but quench one in parks or aaa oil and the other in mineral oil would there be that huge of a difference?
What would be the numerical difference on a scale of one to ten? One being poorest and ten being the best?
Its hard to understand it all. In actual performance how much do you really gain? Is there a difference in practical performance? Or is it all just theory?
I dont know enough to have an opinion, but the information is somewhat confusing. There is no real consensus.
So what works just fine?
jake