The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
I get what you mean now. Weird how I didn't understand it in much simpler terms. And to anybody who wants to say something negative or insulting, I know physics pretty well. I don't know the formulas and all that useless (if you aren't going into a physics intensive field) stuff, but I understand the physics themselves.Basically by removing material from the blade, it changes how forces act along the radial axis of the knife blade. Instead of having a large amount of the force concentrated at the center of that axis, the "blood groove" is supposed to remove enough steel from that center point to allow a degree of flexibility. As a result, the torsional forces acting on the knife are concentrated on the two, thicker, pieces of steel that are located further from the center of rotation.
Once again. This seems to come up over and over. Removing material does not make the structure stronger. A steel I-beam is stronger than a solid beam of the equivalent weight, but not as strong as a solid beam of the same external dimensions.
Had to prove you wrong. There is a solid that compresses. We call it ice. The Ice itself can be compressed, and when it melts it becomes more dense. Hence why ice floats in water.Nothing mentioned will increase density. Metal being maleable and a wire edge (?) is just pushing material around, not compressing it and making it denser. A super ball isn't compressed either, it deforms then springs back to the original shape providing energy for the bounce. It's just a spring of sorts. Liquids and solids can't be compressed. That's why hydraulics work.
Had to prove you wrong. There is a solid that compresses. We call it ice. The Ice itself can be compressed, and when it melts it becomes more dense. Hence why ice floats in water.
Basically by removing material from the blade, it changes how forces act along the radial axis of the knife blade. Instead of having a large amount of the force concentrated at the center of that axis, the "blood groove" is supposed to remove enough steel from that center point to allow a degree of flexibility. As a result, the torsional forces acting on the knife are concentrated on the two, thicker, pieces of steel that are located further from the center of rotation.
I'm not sure that last part makes sense. What type of strength are you talking about? Barrel stiffness? I don't think so.Cuts made on a rifle barrel are commonly called flutes. This reduces weight and increase strength buy increasing the surface area.
To the OP, excellent question; glad to finally have a better understanding of it's function.
I must of missed something, was there an explanation of it's function?![]()
Once again. This seems to come up over and over. Removing material does not make the structure stronger. A steel I-beam is stronger than a solid beam of the equivalent weight, but not as strong as a solid beam of the same external dimensions.
A fuller can be used to reduce the weight of a blade while retaining more strength than simply making the whole blade thinner or smaller.
I must of missed something, was there an explanation of it's function?![]()
As stated, the name "blood groove" is based on a myth. Anyone who believes it has obviously never used a knife to puncture an animal's body cavity. It makes no difference.
They are usually used to reduce weight while preserving strength (same physics principles behind the "I-beam"). In the case of the Pilot's Survival Knife made by Camillus and Ontario, the groove also has the added benefit of allowing the blade to turn during use, when the sawback is used for its intended role (sawing through aluminum aircraft skins). If there were no fuller in the blade, it would be much more difficult to rotate the blade to make curved cuts, while it's plunged into a rigid piece of metal.
Done and done.
Once again. This seems to come up over and over. Removing material does not make the structure stronger. A steel I-beam is stronger than a solid beam of the equivalent weight, but not as strong as a solid beam of the same external dimensions.