- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
- Messages
- 4,212
All of us WSS knifemakers are paying attention.
I started out around the 4 inch mark on my wilderness knives but seem to do most of them around 5.5 to 6.5 inches.
A lot of the knives in that range from production companies seem to go about it a bit wrong, either miniaturizing really big knives (seems the most common problem) or overbuilding medium size knives into KSAs
It's not really that hard to make a 5 inch knife do well on fine work. It's all geometry and handle ergonomics. I go from a small knife and grow it- To misquote George Buehler, I make a lot of big little knives.
For my own use, I find the extra inch or two is great for batoning, food prep, and doesn't take away too much from fine tip work.
This is exactly my philosophy. If I'm carrying a larger knife (8+ inch blade), machete or axe, then that 3-4 inch bladed knife will be fine. For my purposes, the 7" blades are just too big to comfortably carry on your body without getting hung up or being too cumbersome. The 5-5.5" bladed knife is about as large as I can go to ensure it carries well and will be carried all the time. My most recent revelation was a ton of traveling in Iraq by vehicle, helo or fixed wing...with full IBA, combat load and small pack. I had to have a smaller fixed blade that I could readily access and not have it get snagged or hung up; the 5-6" blade was as big as I could go. With the right profile (wide with either a good convex or full flat grind) they do chop well...every inch helps, but for me I found a point of diminishing returns beyond 6" without having to toss the larger knife into the pack because I just couldn't carry it well or all the time.
When comparing the size of knives, there will always be compromises, you just have to figure out what works best for you based on your requirements, carrying options and skill.
ROCK6