- Joined
- May 10, 2015
- Messages
- 490
I love my Survive! Knives. I have more time behind my 4.1 than any of my other models, and it has earned a place on my short list of preferred knives. There's nearly always one with me.
Having said this, there are times I wish my S! knives could do certain things better.
I'd like a GSO 4.1 blade with more flex possible without losing any toughness... And this is a limitation of the steel, not the design. It isn't ideal to filet a fish with a rigid piece of steel.
I would like a "Necker 3" designed with less emphasis on utility, and more capable of skinning an elk or deer. I often look at my Necker 2 and wish the handle remained the same, but the blade was flipped over, and the knife redesigned with a belly rather than a straight edge. The 2.7 might address much of this, but I envision a 2.7 blade with a Necker 2 handle.
I think the new 4.5 will be closer, but I have often wished for a S!K knife with a more classic Woodlore feel... Without being a Ray Mears clone.
Having said this, there are times I wish my S! knives could do certain things better.
I'd like a GSO 4.1 blade with more flex possible without losing any toughness... And this is a limitation of the steel, not the design. It isn't ideal to filet a fish with a rigid piece of steel.
I would like a "Necker 3" designed with less emphasis on utility, and more capable of skinning an elk or deer. I often look at my Necker 2 and wish the handle remained the same, but the blade was flipped over, and the knife redesigned with a belly rather than a straight edge. The 2.7 might address much of this, but I envision a 2.7 blade with a Necker 2 handle.
I think the new 4.5 will be closer, but I have often wished for a S!K knife with a more classic Woodlore feel... Without being a Ray Mears clone.