nozh2002
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2003
- Messages
- 5,736
Vassili,
This is why we invite and encourage all makers and manufacturers to do their own performance testing on their own knives in "LIVE" demonstrations at the BLADE show. It's their reputation on the line, therefore they should be the ones who do the testing.
Customers have NOTHING to lose, and their objectivity is always called into question when comparison edge tests are published. If a "fanboy" for a particular brand of knives does comparison edge testing, then how can anyone be sure that the bevel geometry and edges are actually equal? How can we be sure that they are playing fair?
On page 4 you made my point with this post.
You are correct my friend! . . . . No one else has done this demonstration. . . . . That "Booming Silence" says more than any third party comparison tests on edge holding.
Perhaps you should invite these other makers and manufacturers to duplicate our "LIVE" tests at next year's BLADE Show?. . . . That could prove to be interesting. :thumbup:
Let's Drink! :thumbup:
Jerry![]()
I do not think that this "booming scielence" say anything but the fact they do not want to do this very hard work! As I sad I damage my wrist and it is not completely healed yet. Even I did way more easy cutting in longer period of time.
From other hand there is ABS competitions - did you ever participated there or at least do what they did with INFI? It will be at least some kind of side by side testing.
Did you ever done CATRA tests and make it public?
Manufacturers may have other reasons not to join somebody else testing efforts. If you remember I post on Busse Forum request for you to make Mule knife with INFI by Spyderco specification so we will be able to compare all their steels with INFI (and ideally SR101 and SR77 as well)...
Thanks, Vassili.