The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
I whittler, in my view must have a clip main, coping and pen or small clip blades.Case makes a 47 pattern with these blades.Are you guys saying its not a whittler?Its a stock knife pattern,but not stockman blades.
Don, now that I see the image you just posted, I'd consider that a whittler "if" the master rode on two backsprings. Is that "47" a two or three spring knife?
The blade selection pretty much duplicates the Case 6380 (Big Whittler) pattern. (Which does have the master riding on the two backsprings.)
Its actually a 3 backspring with the master riding the center line.
But the other part of me wonders why whittlers and their fans need to be so pretentious about what defines a whittler; other pattern collectors aren't so anal. Muskrat collectors maybe, who may claim that a muskrat is only a true muskrat if it has the single backspring, despite the decades of examples that use 2 springs. But you don't see people getting in a twist over Case using 4 springs for congresses or Buck making stockmans with 3 springs.
I think it has to do with the uniqueness and complexity of the construction of "true" whittlers. 3 blade whittlers are "true" whittlers the same way a Porsche 914 is a "true" Porsche.
I'm sorry, "pretentious" and "anal" were the best words I could come up with at the time. I didn't mean anything negative by using those words. I can't think of the right word. Punctilious maybe?I'd have to strongly disagree. I see lots of folks with "issues" about all of the variants you bring up...from congress knives to muskrats to stock knives and more. It's not anal...that just demeans and reduces any attempt to catalog and define the patterns to a capricious exercise. (I'd hardly consider Levine's guide capricious or whimsical but that doesn't mean everyone feels that way.)
Companies call their knives what they will. For those for whom this practice suffices, so be it. For those who wish to be more precise in defining the attributes and characteristics of a particular pattern, more clarity is called for.
To each his own (without the need for finger pointing and divisiveness.)
I'm sorry, "pretentious" and "anal" were the best words I could come up with at the time. I didn't mean anything negative by using those words. I can't think of the right word. Punctilious maybe?
And I'll take your word for it regarding other patterns; you've been here longer than I have.I just haven't seen it in my (short) time here.
These are whittlers!!
![]()