Well since in both your posts you call out the SRK, and the $40 mark, (both of which are things I mentioned), I’ll assume the remark was directed at me.
It’s safe to say that cost and availability are closely related. No need to take that literally, of course there are outlier examples but it mostly holds true. You’re more likely to acquire a crate of SK-5 SRKs than you are a crate of 3V SRKs... companies make more and stock more of items that sell more and cost less. If you don’t agree I’ll find plenty of examples

So my rationale is solid: Less expensive knives will be more readily available... and you’re more likely to get a few hundred $40 SRKs than you are a few hundred Bark River Bravos or Lon Humphrey Alphas.
Now we can get into money in exchange for other goods that might be more valuable than knives, if money is still worth something in this scenario.. but I’ll frame this as “yes it is”, and “less money for knives means more money for other things”.