afishhunter
Basic Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2014
- Messages
- 14,441
1950's~early 1960's(?)* Ulster N°10 compared to 1956~1988 Imperial. (I don't know the model number for the shell Barlow.)
As you can see, the poor Ulster had suffered significant blade loss before I got it.
(I've only stropped it.)
Would y'all agree she's lost over 25% but less than 51% (clip point) and more than 51% on the pen blade?
Am I wrong to be ... hesitant ... to tote the Ulster, in order to preserve what's left, and tote the Imperial instead?
Both knives are still tight; no wiggly wobbly blades.
View attachment 1945782
View attachment 1945783
(*I haven't been able to find an Ulster tang stamp chart.
I "know" it predates the RJR "Old Timer" promotion. No "Ulster Old Timer" on it.)
As you can see, the poor Ulster had suffered significant blade loss before I got it.

Would y'all agree she's lost over 25% but less than 51% (clip point) and more than 51% on the pen blade?
Am I wrong to be ... hesitant ... to tote the Ulster, in order to preserve what's left, and tote the Imperial instead?
Both knives are still tight; no wiggly wobbly blades.
View attachment 1945782
View attachment 1945783
(*I haven't been able to find an Ulster tang stamp chart.
I "know" it predates the RJR "Old Timer" promotion. No "Ulster Old Timer" on it.)
Last edited: