TheCarbideRat
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,510
Price gouging does exist, seen it with my eyes but I do agree with alot of this discussion.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
It would be deeply appreciated however if you could talk about what makes a knife worth its price tag, especially if you are an owner of top brand knives.
Thanks.
I just saw one bid on a collector maybe user (depending on if the buyer will use it etc.) knife. $2500. That has thrown my radar out of whack about what is expensive or not. Suddenly $400 for a knife seem like small change.
Yep, needs to be in perspective, I like to post this Ron Lake folder in threads complaining about Sebenza costs, make no mistake this is a tough usable knife but I doubt the new owner will be cutting firewood with it...
............at a $33,000 sale price.
Its the basics of the quality of fit, finish, feel, and materials to start and the cost will adjust up or down based on the result. If a maker cannot market his product at an acceptable margin one of the basics must be adjusted (produce it cheaper, use cheaper materials etc.) or not go to market. Stuff like maker reputation or warranty or volume efficiency (SAK) or lack of volume efficiencies (CRKs 1000 small Sebenzas annually) will also adjust the cost.
As for quality you just cant tell until you have handled and inspected a lot of knives and know what you are feeling and seeing. At a show handle a bunch of Beckers, ESEE, and a bunch of Busses. Then move on to Randalls, Doziers and if youre lucky and somebody has one a Loveless. All perfectly fine blades for their cost. Its an enlightening experience and same is true for folders.
Also, dont get confused between the makers cost and the secondary market cost. That secondary market (known as "dealers" for Busse) indicates how desirable the knife is to have in your hand today.
For those interested in what to look at here is an excellent thread from a contest between makers that ran in W&SS.
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=687445
Yep, needs to be in perspective, I like to post this Ron Lake folder in threads complaining about Sebenza costs, make no mistake this is a tough usable knife but I doubt the new owner will be cutting firewood with it...
![]()
............at a $33,000 sale price.
Well said. As are most of the posts on this thread.Let's face it: If you don't enjoy slicing with a Lochsa more than slicing with a Mora Clipper 860, than you should just stick with the 860. There is a pleasure to be gleaned from using (or just owning) the Lochsa that the 860 just can't provide. That pleasure is linked to the untangible, artistic quality of the knife as well as the superior quality of the materials and craftsmanship. Some people have the appreciation and the means to buy the Lochsa. Others either don't have the means, or just don't see the value in what the Lochsa offers. Both people can cut a bologna sandwich in two. The Lochsa owner just enjoys the process more IMHO ; )
Branding/marketing.
Ego/vanity.
Do you think some buyers may be compensating, in some way?
I personally don't think that one knife that cuts no better than another that has equal materials and an equally good design is actually worth more. But some people just gotta have 'em.
I, personally, wouldn't buy a Busse over a Becker, but that's just me. They're both tough knives and they cut stuff, and that's the bottom line for me.