The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
I think it's a consensus at this point, and for the clarity I thank you all. I guess in thinking about it, I could understand how a person could feel a certain way about something like that, no matter how many different design variations there are out there. I suppose I just wanted some clarity based on my reasoning for even asking such a question. hind sight is always 20/20 though, right? thanks again guys. I appreciate it, and I appreciate being part of such a great community. [emoji4]
Really you opened the can of worms. You liked a design, you didn't like the maker's practices, and you asked if that was justification for having someone else "duplicate" the guys design.
If it wasn't about the using the maker's practices as justification for "duplicating" his design, then I would think you wouldn't have brought it up, and just asked
"Is it acceptable to have one maker duplicate another maker's design?"
I found a knife I really like the design of. I like the artists interpretation of the blade shape, length, and the handle shape as well.
consider me profoundly educated in more ways than expected, and also called out on my verbiage. [emoji38]
I don't really have the time, money, or desire to pursue a lawsuit to the end, or camp on some guys lawn
I would rather listen to good advice and not pay up front.
There's a gray area here where you, as well as the maker you may commission, have to decide whether you're copying another artists work or simply appropriating a good idea.
I'll use Cadillac as an example. If you made an exact aesthetic replica of a Cadillac Escalade, but used an old Ford drive train, you'd absolutely be guilty of stealing an artists design. The rest of the auto industry's use of Cadillac's unique control layout 100 years ago, resulting in the way most vehicle controls are configured today was just the appropriation of a good idea. Ultimately making vehicles easier to operate for us all.
If you like the combination of a pretty standard blade shape and the ergonomics of a certain handle, I don't think you're out of line asking another, more reputable maker to do something along the same lines. If however you simply commission someone to render an exact copy of an original work, it's no better than buying a forgery in my book.
Great example. Only difference is legally, unless the knife has any trademark/copyright to it then anyone can use it. Take the game candy crush for example. I can't remember but I believe the maker copied an un copyrighted game then copyrighted it and took legal action against the guy who made it first but didn't copyright. In my mind taking a design that isn't copyrighted and tweaking it slightly is fine as long as you don't copyright it. If you take an idea copy it then copyright it you're an ***hole. Change one grind line adjust a position of a pin in the handle add lanyard hole and you're in the green if no copyright. If there is copyright then add or subtract some jimping as well and you should be fine. Just make sure to remember it's inspired not copied. Not trying to add personal beliefs but I think copyrights are stupid and we as a society would progress further without them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agree with Marci here...
You don't want to deal with a maker because they are basically "unethical" but you don't seem to find it unethical to have someone copy their design?!
Same as buying a Strider clone because you can't afford the real deal and trying to justify that.
It's your values, you do whatever you feel is necessary....personally, there is no knife so perfect that I would compromise my ethical beliefs to get it.