I thin Cliff is thinking of AUS-10 Which is slightly ahead of 440-c. But is very comparable. Aus-8 is the equivalent of 440-B. I have done a lot of testing on Aus-8. In fact I'm carrying one right now. It isn't in anyway the equal of 440-c. Unlike a previous poster, I have never seen a Chi-com knife make of 440-c. What was the knife. I would like to know. It has been said here, and other places time and time again. IF THE BLADE IS MARKED 440 stainless IT IS NOT 440-C!!! Period. The chi's use 440-a almost exclusively. It is an inferior steel. cheap to buy. Cheap to work, easy on tooling in a manufacturing setting and Easy to heat treat. The Plus side is that the unwary will see 440 and think it is quality steel. Aus-8 is right behind it. Again. think 440-B. The C in 44o-c stands for cutlery grade. Some think it stands for carbon. both fit. It has enough carbon to properly harden . The others do not. I have never seen a 440-a-b Or aus 6-8 blade rc above 55. Most lower. They sometimes use the trick of cyanide to case harden the stainless to make it seem harder. But it is only a shallow surface treatment. Ever wonder why some Gerber's will hold an edge when new, then won't hold it at all in a few months when they get a few sharpenings under they're belt. Same problem with 420SS. The old Gerber's from Portland were made of m-2, and 440-c. They were famous for their performance. Mike