What's the knife that has disappointed you the most?

Sebenza. Just did nothing for me at all, and was uncomfortable in hand. :(

blasphemy lol!!!!!!!!!

i never saw big deal either, other than superb F&F, it just never "grabbed" me like others have.

didnt like kerambits either, didnt like the blade shape or the big ring sticking up outta my pocket, only pro to it was it was so easy to sell, a tarani master model, one of the better ones, supposedly, was also kinda rough, in finish and operation.

the fact that my fav at the time, the REKAT sifu, just wouldnt hold up without lock probs also was a major drag, i loved the design, but after lock probs with not one, not two but 3 or 4 i decided to try something else.
 
ZT302 it was the quickest knife I ever returned. It's a brick with an edge. The other was the full size grip those handles just feel sooooo junky
 
Biggest disapointment was when I lost my Buck 55 look-a-like knife which I adored and few years later bought same looking, except that knife refuses to get edge. I've used anything from power tools to diamond files to try make it so it could something but no.

2 persons I know and have a lot done sharpeneing ( both are professional cooks / chef's ) tried and said they cannot sharpen it and it probably does not sharpen ever.
 
The Cold Steel Ti-Lite (titanium version) is by far the most disappointing. The lock couldn't be released without a screwdriver and it looked like a made-in-China gas station knife. All for $150.
 
the kissing cranes from 70's & 80's. cut cardboard less time than any brand i ever tested.about 3 minutes was max. good eye would do 12 minutes. myself & friends swore these very pretty knives had blades of lead.have'nt had interest to test them in yrs. since.
 
I love Buck knives... not so much the 850 Bravo I bought for my son's Christmas last year from a mail order site. I had to look at it - good thing, as it was defective. NIB, the single bevel Besh Wedge rubbed it's 154CM edge against the steel liner, dulling it. A new Buck that wouldn't cut paper, much less shave... how strange! A second example was better, the blade was properly centered and sharp. Sadly, it and the original had another problem. The clip screws, with the clip removed and screw replaced, pushed the G10 scale edges away from the liner - daylight could be seen - a credit card would fit. I was just disgusted with the lack of QC - rare for a Buck.

Actually, since that Bravo was a present for my son - and he was happy with it - that wasn't a problem for long here. My longest term dislike was my first ever Benchmade - a 551 Griptillian in 440C. Great working knife - nicely made - just so dull NIB that you'd have to heat it up to cut butter. It sat in a drawer for nearly five years, as Bucks, Kershaws, and Spydercos came - razor sharp - and were carried. I finally got a Spydie Sharpmaker, and it became sharp - after some effort. I soon bought more Benchmades...

Stainz
 
hey KENIX that phrase "synthetic death" should be copywritten i beleive in my lengthty life it's a 1st & gave me my 1st decent laugh today. thanks man
 
Emerson CQC-7....very dull blade, constantly had to fiddle with the pivot screw to get the right tension but it would never stay, and it had a crunchy liner lock. That was BNIB too. I have a Benchmade version that is way better.

Spyderco Rookie...would have kept it if it had dual liners instead of just one.
 
Production Emersons. Why in the world would a $200+ (MSRP) knife have a chisel-ground secondary bevel? The pivots are sub-par in my opinion as well. I have yet to see one that operated smoothly without significant blade play. When you tighten the pivot tension, it makes awful gritty noises and loosens up again in about five cycles. Thumb plates are perfectly round (no flat places where it sits against the blade) so you can loosen the plate just by twisting it to the left. And to top it off, their biggest draw (wave feature) is done better by Spyderco (opens easier, more reliably, and doesn't wear hard on a pocket). I respect Ernie a hell of a lot, but I think that his production knives deliver WAY too little for the asking price. If any of you guys really love them, more power to ya', but they sure aren't for me.

I was also a bit disappointed with my CS barong machete. The sweet spot is a fair way away from the end of the blade (which is partly due to the blade style, but I mean more than it should be) and the rubber handle (while comfortable) shreds up easily and is prone towards twisting in the hand if a glancing blow is struck because the handle is just a hair too round. it was cheap and I still like it, but I'll probably end up tearing the handle off of it and doing something different with it. :)
 
Buck 110 folder. It was great quality wise but it always seemed that the bolsters needed polishing and I never understood the need for a heavy folder in a belt sheath. If I'm going to wear a sheath it will be a fixed blade probably of equal or lesser weight. If I want a folder it will have a pocket clip and be lighter. I had it for over 10 years and never carried or used, sold it for $20 last year.
 
I've hated on this knife a lot on these forums, but I was supremely disappointed with the cold steel ti-lite 4". My grievances include: Inaccessible thumb stud, sharp quillons, slow deployment, cheapo box, thick blade. It came pretty dull too and smelled like synthetic death. Maybe I just had a lemon but :rolleyes: that was a dreadful purchase.

I will say it was beautifully balanced and would have made a good $45 throwing knife.

I came here to post this.
 
The Buck Strider Tarani in FRN and 420. Too many cooks spoiled this pottage, it's a mess. I honestly thought it was made in China until I looked at some others I had and realized they were better.

The only thing Strider about this knife is the silhoutte, and shows just how far a design can be abused when a marketing department decides to maximize value engineering. The FRN scales were so sharply checkered they had the ability to rasp wood, and would slot a jeans pocket in a matter of a few short weeks. Held together with rivets, the effect is lowest bottom dollar construction. FRN not having sufficient stiffeness in this size means adding liners, and the excuse to let one of them be the liner lock. The liners are about 1/3 the thickness of the blade, and stainless, with the shortest leaf cutout possible.

With a thin and short stainless liner, the recipe for failing to lock is guaranteed. I could pressure the blade by hand and unlock it. I sent it back and got another just as bad. It makes no difference if Buck Customer Service is one of the best when they can't ship a knife back in working order.

Tarani did no favors modifying what is regarded as a classic design. The SnG doesn't need the operator's enhancement of a stippled blade surface for handle down gravity opening. A gimmick blade deployment if ever, you're left holding the blade, duh, not the handle. That is not high speed low drag, much less being so enfeebled that your opponent obviously could disarm every other means of defense you had to leave you with a cheap knife.

The hollow grind and gripping surface also makes deep cuts like taking down cardboard boxes a challenge at best. The blade wedges in the cut because of the pronounced swedge, and the stippling creates even more friction to hang things up, exactly what a user does not need - especially in stressful use.

The Buck Tarani deserves a lawsuit for intellectual property abuse, but unfortunately, it was done under cover of a license - to steal, I guess, and I was my money. At $65, I could have had a Vex and $20 change, but what I got was Buck laughing at all the parties to this joke and making bank.

My only solace was that I immediately bought a real SnG - the differences were exponential. I even bought a Buck Mayo - and that proved Buck could mostly get it right, when they have the character to do it. Too bad the ball detent doesn't work, but the price was right, as another knife lover dumped it for the poor workmanship.

Paul Bos did ok on the 420, tho, it's the sharpest 420 I've ever owned. Almost as good as real knife steel, but that's not his fault. The Mayo in S30V shows what that can be. At least that one gets his mark.

Lots of owners of the G10/ATS34 knives have good opinions of their versions, and those don't seem to be a problem. Step down to the FRN level tho, and you'll find a company that can either show what they can do - Gerber with the legendary LST, or what they can't - the Tarani.
 
The Benchmade 211 Activator has been my biggest disappointment. It was dull beyond imagination (think butter knife!) I spent over an hour putting a servicable edge on it. And the scales looked nothing like the photo: I had to oil and buff them. The sheath is nice. Way too much money for what I got; haven't looked at a Benchmade since.
 
Fightin' Rooster Sunfish,the two smaller blades rub together when opening and closing.It has scratched the living S#$T out of them,what a P.O.S.!!! I can't even stand to look at it anymore.
 
CRKT's lineup of tough folders.

ive owned most of them..i owned the M16 MIL big dog...it was a tought knife, but the chisel grind sucked and i could never get an edge that was worth a sh*t on any of those chisel ground knives. I owned the M16 special forces also in the big tanto version..same thing..i hated the chisel grind.

i bought a large and small CRKT M21 G10..they werent chisel ground and they were and are the best folders i have ever bought brom CRKT aside from my assiset hissatsu folder of course:D
 
Benchmade Ti Lum 760 in CPM M4 steel.

Looking at the knife's pedigree, price, what it's made of and by whom and you would think it's a can't miss.

You would be wrong though. I currently have around 12 Ti framelocks, even more linerlocks and other types including Ti lockbacks. I've had a lot more in the past I've gotten rid of for one reason or another.

Out of the box this knife was dull as a butter knife , without exaggeration. Not "dull for a benchmade", but really dull. It also wasn't aligned properly. In addition the lock was the worst by far on a framelock I've ever seen.

To unlock it you have to brace it, and use two fingers and a thumb. It's painful, and would be dangerous if the knife were sharp.

The total opposite of the smooth, and powerful 630 Skirmish, with a large blade that can shave arm hairs out of the box, which is more what I've come to expect from benchmade.

My other two knives in M4 from benchmade could be described as sharp, but not smooth shaving like the Skirmish, Stryker, 530, Ritter Grip, etc., etc., They scraped a bit, but did remove the hairs.

Even my $19 red box Pika in 9Cr13CoMoV came built better, sharper and with better grinds.

What a shame. This one should have one of Benchmade's best ever, not worst ever.
 
Last edited:
I got two folding knives for $1.98 from an ad in the back of a comic book. I was in jr. high school. Yes they looked just like the picture and about the same size... about 2" oal.

Ric

I think I got the same knives, ordered from a comic book ad. Ordered them in 1972 I believe.
 
The Buck Strider Tarani in FRN and 420. Too many cooks spoiled this pottage, it's a mess. I honestly thought it was made in China until I looked at some others I had and realized they were better.

The only thing Strider about this knife is the silhoutte, and shows just how far a design can be abused when a marketing department decides to maximize value engineering. The FRN scales were so sharply checkered they had the ability to rasp wood, and would slot a jeans pocket in a matter of a few short weeks. Held together with rivets, the effect is lowest bottom dollar construction. FRN not having sufficient stiffeness in this size means adding liners, and the excuse to let one of them be the liner lock. The liners are about 1/3 the thickness of the blade, and stainless, with the shortest leaf cutout possible.

With a thin and short stainless liner, the recipe for failing to lock is guaranteed. I could pressure the blade by hand and unlock it. I sent it back and got another just as bad. It makes no difference if Buck Customer Service is one of the best when they can't ship a knife back in working order.

Tarani did no favors modifying what is regarded as a classic design. The SnG doesn't need the operator's enhancement of a stippled blade surface for handle down gravity opening. A gimmick blade deployment if ever, you're left holding the blade, duh, not the handle. That is not high speed low drag, much less being so enfeebled that your opponent obviously could disarm every other means of defense you had to leave you with a cheap knife.

The hollow grind and gripping surface also makes deep cuts like taking down cardboard boxes a challenge at best. The blade wedges in the cut because of the pronounced swedge, and the stippling creates even more friction to hang things up, exactly what a user does not need - especially in stressful use.

The Buck Tarani deserves a lawsuit for intellectual property abuse, but unfortunately, it was done under cover of a license - to steal, I guess, and I was my money. At $65, I could have had a Vex and $20 change, but what I got was Buck laughing at all the parties to this joke and making bank.

My only solace was that I immediately bought a real SnG - the differences were exponential. I even bought a Buck Mayo - and that proved Buck could mostly get it right, when they have the character to do it. Too bad the ball detent doesn't work, but the price was right, as another knife lover dumped it for the poor workmanship.

Paul Bos did ok on the 420, tho, it's the sharpest 420 I've ever owned. Almost as good as real knife steel, but that's not his fault. The Mayo in S30V shows what that can be. At least that one gets his mark.

Lots of owners of the G10/ATS34 knives have good opinions of their versions, and those don't seem to be a problem. Step down to the FRN level tho, and you'll find a company that can either show what they can do - Gerber with the legendary LST, or what they can't - the Tarani.

Absolutely agree. Mine was a bigger waste because I paid more for the
ATS-34. Quite likely the worst knife I've ever had, especially at the price point.
 
Greco Scagel!

Bought when he was touting the "last Grecos EVER." It arrived with scratches on blade and when I called, he said it was from slipping while he drove on the guard and should be condidered "normal."

I swallowed that and was never ...really .... satisfied with the edge either.

The blade spontaneously stained into carbon spots. I....attempted.... to make it "reasonably" presentable and tried mustard finish and various grits to help polish. The grind also had a prominent change in the grind where it looked like he had started the grind and then put it at a different angle to finish, leaving a distinct ridge where the change was.

I finally got mad at the damn thing once and THREW it down. My fault. Not respectable behavior at all on my part. It was pure ABUSE.

But, when it hit the floor, the blade snapped off at the guard. Very sharp stress riser where the tang met the blade.

knifebreak.jpg


I called him and SHOULD have lied but told him the truth that I had abused it.

He offered me a 10% discount on another one.

Knowing the method of manufacture on THIS model, I asked if I could use the 10% on a DIFFERENT style. One that could not have a stress riser.

He said he would only allow the discount to apply to the very same model.

I have never bought from him again.

Even though he is no longer using the "last of" promo.

:grumpy:
 
Back
Top