- Joined
- Jun 16, 2003
- Messages
- 20,203
"Philosophical questions" often have no black-and-white answers.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Why is it not a sword? It certainly looks far more like a sword than a machete, and it will certainly not perform the intended purpose of a machete as well as a real one would. Is it completely unsharpened?
Are we really going to get into nit-picky exceptions here? We are discussing a broader philosophical question here and you want to illustrate where white becomes gray?
"Philosophical questions" often have no black-and-white answers.
No.You see the difficulty of trying to employ a "use" or "design" argument to settle this issue, no?
No.
If it can kill with the edge or point, it is still a sword. If it can't, then it's either a trophy, a toy, or a club. It's irrelevant whether it's made of carbon steel or peanut butter.
The blade is built in similar style to patterns used for dense grass and lush vegetation. It is not a wood chopping tool, but it is still equal parts tool and weapon AFTER is primary function as a symbol of status. Here's an example with a heavier patterned blade that would chop wood like a woodchuck (if a woodchuck could chop wood)![]()
Excellent! My wife won't let me have even a replica sword, but I have a very pointy stick that could kill you with its point (it's very hard wood and a very pointy point). So now I have a sword! Sweet!
Dude. A pointy stick is called a spear.![]()
I would probably consider that a sword or possibly a very large knife. It may have other purposes beyond killing people, but it is still designed to kill. It's not ideal for either.
I see it as somewhat akin to Star Wars light sabers. They are clearly intended primarily to lop off heads and extremities, but they are pretty good at burning through blast doors, deflecting blaster bolts, and absorbing force lightning.![]()
Nope. This one is too short to be a spear. Too long to be a knife though. But it has a definite point and can kill you. So it must be a sword. In fact, I whittled the point to function as a weapon, so it was even designed to be a sword. And I wrapped one end with paracord. It's about 28" or so long, has a paracord handle, was intended to be a weapon and has a point that can kill you.
Must be a sword.
This thread has occasioned a pleasant memory that poses a similar question. Who remembers The Man from U.N.C.L.E.? Napoleon Solo had a pistol to which could be added a stock and extended barrel. (I had the toy version.)
At what point does a "pistol" become a "rifle"? With the stock and barrel? Stock only? Barrel only? Neither?
With any luck I will have nuked this thread for keeps.
Governmental authority answers such questions with statutes, regulations, and judgments. We have no such authority on this issue - in reality.