- Joined
- Mar 8, 2008
- Messages
- 25,908
The European scythe is a marvelous tool indeed, and while the the European scythe is more difficult to fit and maintain, I feel the method of use is much more intuitive. The problem is when people confuse "intuitive" with "effective" or "efficient". Likewise the adjustability of the American scythe makes it easier for people to adjust the tool to their proportions, but this means there's a TON of variation between users with regard to the grip orientations. These are harder to describe and really have to come from personal fiddling to find what's most comfortable. Usually, the tool is then left in this position in perpetuity, which is why the grips are rusted in position on so many antiques. The proper spacing between them is easy to find and set, though, and the wide range of positions the blade can be securely set at allows you to adjust for different conditions or environments.
Generally speaking, the European scythe is best suited to wide sweeps on smooth ground (level ground or hillsides, but with few bumps or ditches) with lighter targets. The American scythe, on the other hand, fares well in variegated terrain against both heavy and light targets. Little difference is experienced between tackling stemmed plants or leafy greens. It's like the difference between a road bike or a mountain bike. Two variations of the same machine designed for different environments, and equally good in their own right.
:thumbup:
Generally speaking, the European scythe is best suited to wide sweeps on smooth ground (level ground or hillsides, but with few bumps or ditches) with lighter targets. The American scythe, on the other hand, fares well in variegated terrain against both heavy and light targets. Little difference is experienced between tackling stemmed plants or leafy greens. It's like the difference between a road bike or a mountain bike. Two variations of the same machine designed for different environments, and equally good in their own right.
