HoB said:
Well, you brought up a few very good points:
1.) Bulk. Because Vic is selling so many knives, producing so many knives, that they can make them a whole lot cheaper. There is a big difference between making 50000 pieces and making 1000 pieces in a typical run. Simply because of the deal with Walmart the Native price dropped by about $10!
2.) How are the parts of a SAK actually made? They are blanked by stamping if I am not mistaken and that includes the blades aswell. Not all materials can be blanked by stamping and depends also on material thickness. Precisely the reason why the typical SAK will not have a 4 mm thick ATS-34 blade with a distal taper. On some Spyderco models not even the liners can be stamped. And G-10, Mircarta and CF require milling and grinding instead of moulding. I would assume that the assembly of the parts is the least of the cost in either case.
Good point about the numbers. It is true that the more you make, the cheaper you can make it up to a point. But the Swiss are paying shipping, import fees, distributors profit. That puts something made here in America on a more even footing.
About number 2 though. As far as the thickness you mentioned, they can indeed be stamped. The Buck 110 blade has been stamped for decades now with a Niagra punch press. These days it's even easier with the laser and water jet cuters that can profile out heavy steel plate in just a few minutes. Most people who have not worked in the machinist trade have no idea of just how easy some of this has gotten. You like the close tolerances of the Sebanza? No problem, you can make corections in the program to .001 of an inch while you are running the parts. In fact, CNC machines have made it far easier to work to very close spec's than the old mills because of the new technology. And they hold it like never before. As far as the distil taper, thats in the grinding. The new automated grinding machines are just awesome to watch. Both Victorinox and Opinel use fully automated grinders, and the Opinel has a convex blade.
On the couple of high dollar tacticals I have taken apart I have found faint traces of the shear marks on the liners, and the liner lock piece that were not quite all buffed out. On one of them I found punch marks on the inside of the pivot hole that were not quite polished out. I had to use a magnifier, but they were there and I know what I was looking at.
I don't mind a higher price if there is clear sign quality goes with it. That you are really getting something extra for your money. But all too often these days, something will be "in" or cool to have and the marketers in their greed take advantage of the ignorence of the buying public. I don't think most folks really know what they are buying, as far as materials and just how it's made.
I just wonder, if in an age of mediocrity, we let hype get too overblown?