- Joined
- Aug 7, 2014
- Messages
- 143
1. Ridiculous argument. Spyderco uses tons of knives that don't use back locks. If you don't like them, buy a different knife.
2. Ridiculous argument. Spyderco's designs vary alot, and they collaborate with tons of knife makers to create one of the most diverse knife lineups of any company. Just look at some of their most popular designs. For example, the Delica, Paramilitary, Manix lightweight, Gayle Bradley, and Brad Southard. 4 different locking systems, 5 different steels, 3 different scale materials, and 5 very different overall designs.
3. If you don't like the Spyderhole, maybe Spyderco isn't for you. But there are several ways to open them (thumb, finger flicks, spyder drop, zip tie method), and the Spyderhole is one of the quickest non-auto opening methods if you do it right. I'm not sure how the finger flick is hard to learn or gimmicky? It's quick and easy for myself and others. Perhaps you could explain this?
4. Ridiculous argument. Sure, FRN makes up a decent amount of Spyderco's lineup, but the majority of their knives don't use FRN. They have knives with everything from G10 scales to aluminum to titanium to wood and bone. FRN was created to be light weight, strong, easy to work with texturally while being cheaper than other lightweight options like titanium. It does a good job of fulfilling its intended purpose. FRN feels far from cheap compared to plastics from other brands (for example Benchmade Griptilian scales), and is a great material that holds up over time. If you don't like it, then don't buy an FRN knife.
It sounds like you just wanted to make things up to complain about. All but your dislike for the Spyderhole are easily avoidable within the Spyderco brand, and your arguments against the spyderhole sounds like you just don't have much experience with the deployment method.
2. Ridiculous argument. Spyderco's designs vary alot, and they collaborate with tons of knife makers to create one of the most diverse knife lineups of any company. Just look at some of their most popular designs. For example, the Delica, Paramilitary, Manix lightweight, Gayle Bradley, and Brad Southard. 4 different locking systems, 5 different steels, 3 different scale materials, and 5 very different overall designs.
3. If you don't like the Spyderhole, maybe Spyderco isn't for you. But there are several ways to open them (thumb, finger flicks, spyder drop, zip tie method), and the Spyderhole is one of the quickest non-auto opening methods if you do it right. I'm not sure how the finger flick is hard to learn or gimmicky? It's quick and easy for myself and others. Perhaps you could explain this?
4. Ridiculous argument. Sure, FRN makes up a decent amount of Spyderco's lineup, but the majority of their knives don't use FRN. They have knives with everything from G10 scales to aluminum to titanium to wood and bone. FRN was created to be light weight, strong, easy to work with texturally while being cheaper than other lightweight options like titanium. It does a good job of fulfilling its intended purpose. FRN feels far from cheap compared to plastics from other brands (for example Benchmade Griptilian scales), and is a great material that holds up over time. If you don't like it, then don't buy an FRN knife.
It sounds like you just wanted to make things up to complain about. All but your dislike for the Spyderhole are easily avoidable within the Spyderco brand, and your arguments against the spyderhole sounds like you just don't have much experience with the deployment method.