- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 1,202
The Secure-EX sheath "problem" is simply forum and Youtube driven hysteria, nothing more. The truth is that any material sheath that comes in contact with a blade can dull the edge. That's why none of these hysteria-hustlers, when they test the Secure-EX sheath, use the scientific method and test a wide range of materials to compare how much dulling goes on. It is also driven by urban hipster hysteria over lack of knife sharpening skills. That's why so many are whining incessantly if their knives aren't the very latest supersteels, because a lot of younger men don't know and don't want to learn how to sharpen their blades. So they want knives that need the least re-sharpening. By comparison, back in the day, my father and grandfather, who came from suburban areas of New York and Maryland, knew how to sharpen their knives and so did all of their buddies.
I only started hearing the screams about the Secure-EX sheaths after a couple of Youtube and forum posts in the recent past that did not use comparative testing. Prior to that, soldiers and wilderness rescue teams carried legions of SRKs and Recon Tantos into battle and into wilderness survival scenarios in their Secure-EX sheaths and loved them. Same with the Navy SEALS BUDS classes using the SRKs with Secure-EX sheaths.
It is all of this whining that has driven all the great, once affordable US knives into the stratosphere price-wise. Sheaths not good enough, 1095 (including Cro-Van and Mora's 1095), AUS8, Sandvik, 5160, AUS10, 420HC, 01, not good enough. All replaced with safe-queens that cost 2-4x the price that use brittle, hard to sharpen steels that chip easily. I say this as having owned nearly every knife steel on the planet, including custom and semi-custom blades. For some applications, harder steel is useful, but only if it is easy to re-sharpen (52100, 01, etc). Otherwise, all steels dull and need to be re-sharpened on a semi-regular basis if used hard. I prefer steels that with minimal tools and minimal effort, can be brought back to hair-shaving sharpness. 1095, 5160, the old Carbon V, AUS8, 420HC, 01, Sandvik, and 52100 are all great for this. The Stainless Super-Steels and Semi-Stainless Super-Steels are not.
Rant over, lol.
I only started hearing the screams about the Secure-EX sheaths after a couple of Youtube and forum posts in the recent past that did not use comparative testing. Prior to that, soldiers and wilderness rescue teams carried legions of SRKs and Recon Tantos into battle and into wilderness survival scenarios in their Secure-EX sheaths and loved them. Same with the Navy SEALS BUDS classes using the SRKs with Secure-EX sheaths.
It is all of this whining that has driven all the great, once affordable US knives into the stratosphere price-wise. Sheaths not good enough, 1095 (including Cro-Van and Mora's 1095), AUS8, Sandvik, 5160, AUS10, 420HC, 01, not good enough. All replaced with safe-queens that cost 2-4x the price that use brittle, hard to sharpen steels that chip easily. I say this as having owned nearly every knife steel on the planet, including custom and semi-custom blades. For some applications, harder steel is useful, but only if it is easy to re-sharpen (52100, 01, etc). Otherwise, all steels dull and need to be re-sharpened on a semi-regular basis if used hard. I prefer steels that with minimal tools and minimal effort, can be brought back to hair-shaving sharpness. 1095, 5160, the old Carbon V, AUS8, 420HC, 01, Sandvik, and 52100 are all great for this. The Stainless Super-Steels and Semi-Stainless Super-Steels are not.
Rant over, lol.
Last edited: