Why so few custom lockback knives

I prefer slipjoints and lockbacks to liner locks also, and always pair one with a fixed blade for daily carry. The lockback is not easy to make correctly, as Mark Daley stated above. I have been working with Jon Christensen M.S. for quite some time now on a lockback, his learning curve has taken some time with several re-designs, but it is getting there. A few pics of difficult lockback patterns by two of the best,

Jerry Halfrich Hidalgo front lock, Mike Norris "Hornet's Nest" stainless damascus, old growth redwood burl

attachment.php


Joel Chamblin wharncliffe lockback whittler, CTS XHP, stag, 14k gold pins

attachment.php
 
Seems most prefer lockbacks & slipjoints over linerlocks. Yet more linerlocks / framelocks are being made... Is interesting!
 
Not a functional one, more aesthetic. Lockbacks tend to come from slipjoint makers and feature a lot of the 'old timey' flavours found in those knives - bolsters, natural materials, etc. Whereas liner/framelocks tend to follow the aesthetic of tactical folders, with more subdued materials. Generalising wildly here of course...

apart from nostalgia, I see absolutely no benefit, functional or otherwise of a lockback vs. liner or frame lock. Am I blind to something here?
 
Roger makes a great point regarding legality.
I think I'm going to try and design a liner lock folder that has a traditional look. When I can find the time...
 
Take a look at Al Warren. He makes some beautiful midlocks with traditional materials.
 
Liner locks are okay looks and feel wise in my book. Even having previously owned a well contoured albeit rather large frame lock, the Hinderer designed ZT 0560, I still wonder what the big deal is about a knife that has to have a bare metal scale on at least the lock side.
 
Liner locks are okay looks and feel wise in my book. Even having previously owned a well contoured albeit rather large frame lock, the Hinderer designed ZT 0560, I still wonder what the big deal is about a knife that has to have a bare metal scale on at least the lock side.

Not sure what you are saying . . .

But I think some folks prefer frame locks over liner locks because they seem to be more strong and dependable.
 
Hey MT Damascus, can we get a spine shot of that Whittler?


I'm obsessed with these knives at the moment. Working on my own currently. Does this one have tapered springs, or a tapered spacer, both, or neither?
 
Hey MT Damascus, can we get a spine shot of that Whittler?


I'm obsessed with these knives at the moment. Working on my own currently. Does this one have tapered springs, or a tapered spacer, both, or neither?

No taper, I can take a better pic when I get home, if you need.

attachment.php
 
Oh man, that's a lockback whittler, I didn't notice that from the pics, and obviously got too excited to read! ;)


That's killer!
 
apart from nostalgia, I see absolutely no benefit, functional or otherwise of a lockback vs. liner or frame lock. Am I blind to something here?

Yes. Many liner locks have or develop problems and do not lock as reliably. As noted above, some prefer the feel of a lockback. Some don't want a frame lock, they want sweet covers on both sides of a knife :). The symetry of matched wood on both sides of a lockback is sweet. Tony Bose recently posted a premo bannana trapper lockback on his long term thread in Traditional.
 
I love Lockbacks personally. It's a shame that there are so few customs put out these days. The tide will change eventually; such is the way of the world :) great topic! :)
 
Back
Top