Les Robertson
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 10, 1998
- Messages
- 3,565
Steve,
The only reason too much is made of the term tactical is that there are makers and colletors who are trying to get their knives looked at as Tacticals.
It's like that nice looking knife in your picture, that is not a tactical knife. What that is, is a very nice hunter or utility knife.
It doesn't make it any better or worse than a "tactical" knife.
That knife being called a "tactical" knife is nothing more than the maker and/or collector trying to jump on the tactical knife bandwagon.
Why not just call it a "hunter"? After all if you were to submit that knife into a judging competion at a knife show, that is what category it would go into.
As for the "rubber meeting the road" comment I made, you are taking it out of context. I was referring to tactical in regards to other type military operations. Such as Theater or Strategic, again simply a term to help define a look or a category.
There is a reason knife shows have categories for their judging. Usually you find:
Hunter
Utility
Tactical
Bowie
Dagger
Folder
Fantasy
Art
These categories are established to help the knife compete fairly against the other knives in that category. This is not to say that a hunting knife cannot have the tactical look.
When custom knives first became a viable commodity, those who made them had to come up with a term to categorize what they made. Hence the Category "Custom" Knives. Are all the knives that are in this category literally custom knives? No. But you had to call them something.
It's the same with Tactical knives. Are they used strictly by those used in tactical operations? No. Could they just as easily be called utlity knives? Yes.
Tactial Knives do have a particular look and to try and force other type knives into that category, really doesn't make any sense.
The only reason too much is made of the term tactical is that there are makers and colletors who are trying to get their knives looked at as Tacticals.
It's like that nice looking knife in your picture, that is not a tactical knife. What that is, is a very nice hunter or utility knife.
It doesn't make it any better or worse than a "tactical" knife.
That knife being called a "tactical" knife is nothing more than the maker and/or collector trying to jump on the tactical knife bandwagon.
Why not just call it a "hunter"? After all if you were to submit that knife into a judging competion at a knife show, that is what category it would go into.
As for the "rubber meeting the road" comment I made, you are taking it out of context. I was referring to tactical in regards to other type military operations. Such as Theater or Strategic, again simply a term to help define a look or a category.
There is a reason knife shows have categories for their judging. Usually you find:
Hunter
Utility
Tactical
Bowie
Dagger
Folder
Fantasy
Art
These categories are established to help the knife compete fairly against the other knives in that category. This is not to say that a hunting knife cannot have the tactical look.
When custom knives first became a viable commodity, those who made them had to come up with a term to categorize what they made. Hence the Category "Custom" Knives. Are all the knives that are in this category literally custom knives? No. But you had to call them something.
It's the same with Tactical knives. Are they used strictly by those used in tactical operations? No. Could they just as easily be called utlity knives? Yes.
Tactial Knives do have a particular look and to try and force other type knives into that category, really doesn't make any sense.