- Joined
- Feb 14, 2008
- Messages
- 1,093
swing at little ball, chase little ball, repeat.... nope, not for me.
Exactly.
The question is a reminder to those of us who attempt to answer the question(s) not to tie ourselves up with rationalizing a "need" or strict practicality. You kind of set up a condition - a challenge to justify it based on that and it's not necessarily or always about being completely "realistic." Sure, it would be impractical for everyone in the world to return to the wild and expect the earth's resources to support all of us, but the more one knows, the more "tools" one has to work with in a survival situation, whether they are all used or not, and, since they don't weigh anything, we can tote all of them all at once wherever we go.
A big part of it is that it is just fun to learn and to keep "lost arts" alive.
Some of it is about being less dependent and more responsible for ourselves because it teaches us lessons that are applicable in other aspects of life.
Me - I was just raised that way. Not literally in the woods, but we couldn't buy everything so we made stuff and we learned to do things we couldn't pay others to do. Of course, it never occured to us to pay someone else to do much of anything except things like grinding a set of lenses for our glasses and things like that.
I am amazed at how much less independent people in general have become in just my own lifetime of a few days short of half a century. Don't forget the "Wildernes" part of "Wilderness and Survival Skills." It's not ALL about survival and it does teach one more that the direct application of "munching ferns and squirrels."
Squirrels are quite tasty too, by the way. Mmmmm, squirrel gravy and biscuits...... now you're making me hungry.