With the reintroduction of the BK10 and the preexisting bk2 and bk7 (which the 12 was supposed to fill the gap for) why would anyone spend $125 for an RSK2/BK12? Is the quality of the heat treatment, sheath, and overall knife that much more valuable than that of a bk2, bk7, or bk10 (especially the 10, as it seems like that was built to bridge the 2-7 gap)? Upon examination, the sheath seems exactly the same as the kabar one but with a RSK logo on it. COuld somebody please compare these knives for me and understand what the draw of the BK12 is?
P.S. I'm not trying to hate on the 12; it seems like a great knife. However, it also seems a bit overpriced. I just want to know if it is worth buying over a 2, 7, or 10.
P.S. I'm not trying to hate on the 12; it seems like a great knife. However, it also seems a bit overpriced. I just want to know if it is worth buying over a 2, 7, or 10.