I too don't want to drag this down the political road, but all my fellow officers all know that we took an oath to the Constitution, not to any one individual or party. It would be hard to get all those men/women in green or blue to enforce unconstitutional laws...some will, but it wouldn't be fully enforced.
I think the seat-belt is a good analogy to carrying a firearm (as is a spare tire), but as much as I carry concealed and pack when outdoors, I don't think it's as much a necessity as it would have been 150 years ago. Alaska and some remote lower-48 areas still exist where a firearm is highly recommended.
Several hikers don't see the need for a knife...I disagree and feel the same way about firearms. If I can legally carry it and don't mind the weight and accept the fact that it will most likely not be used...why not? It's a very personal choice and more personal preference now days than necessity. A gun is a lot like underwear...no not a necessity, but it adds comfort in some activities and for some, it gives them a little confidence. You can get by without either, but they sure come in handy if an "accident" occurs
ROCK6