WTS: Rolex deep sea dweller - Bell & Ross BR01-94

Status
Not open for further replies.
Feedback: +37 / =0 / -0
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
828
yeah, it's a replica, but it's 1:1 with the real deal.

When i was in Berlin last Dec my wife and I stayed at a bed & breakfast and met someone there who had a factory where they assembled some pretty damn good replicas. I'm a big watch nut, know my watches...
I own and have owned a few authentic Rolexes and Panerais in the past and typically know how to tell one apart, not so with these i got from Gunther.

The detail is unreal, same weight, same size, in fact the case pieces interchange with the authentic watch and that's pretty wild!
The Rolex i bought is a new model Deep Sea Dweller with 43.5mm dia black ceramic bezel, sapphire crystal and stainless case, anti magnetic case cover as the original all the proper markings, the proper font and depth, I had to go to a local Celini (a european high end watch store chain) to study the replica and compare it to an authentic Deep Sea and after about 10 minutes i could not find a difference, it's scary how close they got them.

Gunther told me they don't mess around with quartz models or cheap movements and only make high end replicas with high end movements, knowing a bit about swiss movt. having owned a few I quickly asked what movt. was in the Deep Sea Dweller, to which he replied Swiss ETA2836-2

I know myself that the new Rolex and Omegas come with ETA3035's a new movement, they no longer use the eta2836-2 which they used for almost 2 decades, well the -2 is their second improved version with a regulator but the fact is, these guys use authentic eta2836-2 movt. in the replica Rolex, which says a lot.
The movement alone is $225 on ebay, so i needed to check for myself if in fact this was true. Having seen a few eta2836s in my life i quickly found some scissors and opened up the case cover to inspect and see for myself. Rolexes have a special tool that is used to open up the watch, but those in the know, can do that with a pair of sharp scissors and a little care not to slip and scratch the whole watch, lol...

Sure enough, an eta2836-2 was inside the watch, a 28800 bph mechanism and it was clearly visible even before opening up the watch by the real smooth sweeping second hand that there was a good movt in the watch and not some chinese 21J garbage movt that typically costs $10 on its own.
I knew it had to be a good movt to sweep the second hand this good, but was fearing that i would find a eta2428 or something similar, which is the small - nickle sized movt's that are used in ladies watches, then the rest of the space inside the watch is filled with a heavy sleeve. Can you tell i've seen a few replicas in my life? If the authentic watch comes with an AR crystal, so do these, if they come with serial numbers, so do these, 1mm etched crown on the real Rolex, yup, this one got it also...

So, the next test was to leave it in a glass of water overnight, at least i needed to know if it will survive a downpour or carwash...and it did. There was a visual rubber sleeve under the crown, as per the authentic watch, I was told by Gunther that the Rolexes they build are waterproof to 100m, but not all their replicas are, only the non-chrono mechanisms, their chrono watches are only good for 10m since they have the chrono buttons and it's harder to make them waterproof.

Check this out, it even has the BLUE illumination as the new authentic watch does! And i even removed the steel straps to see if there was a serial number where it should be, and to my surprise, there was, with the proper amount of numbers proper font and in the proper location. These guys don't fool around!

Their chrono watches use a japanese made copy of the ETA Valjoux 7750 movement which was eta's chrono movement and cost a LOT of money, i think around $500 just for the mechanism. They couldn't possibly sell a replica for enough money to cover just the Valjoux mechanism so they had them copied in order to sell them for a fairly reasonable price. I've had the Radiomir and Bell & Ross since Dec and they all keep time perfectly, the Valjoux copies are also 28800 bph (blips per hour) so they also sweep just as smoothly as the eta2638-2 movt in the Deep Sea dweller

Well, why go through all this trouble with a replica you ask? Cause he wanted 450 euro for each watch! That's almost $600 at the time but still about $8500 cheaper than a real Deep Sea, lol

So i took the plunge, bought not only the Deep Sea, but a Panerai Radiomir Rattrapante, which is one of my faves as a dressy watch...and a Bell & Ross.
I have since sold the Radiomir to a neighbor who wouldn't leave me alone until i sold it to him, pics are below that show just how beautiful it was.

I'd like to sell the Rolex Deep Sea Dweller and the Bell & Ross that i bought from him recently because the B&R is just not me, i'm more of a traditional watch wearer and the B&R is totally for someone more cool and stylish.

I'd like to get $485 for either watch so that i can buy something new from him as he is always sending me pics with new watches that they are making.

Here are some pics:

625637956_hn6up-L.jpg


625397254_yWN5c-L.jpg


625397268_PaqLi-L.jpg


625637812_QzGU5-L.jpg


625397433_9tVvG-L.jpg


625397482_i2nmr-L.jpg


776891453_N9rkR-L.jpg


776891477_dY6xx-L.jpg


776891473_RRQKS-L.jpg


790007219_BJDpZ-L.jpg


790007211_TMH8m-L.jpg


1053361697_ojKHB-L.jpg


Bell & Ross

020-L.jpg


021-L.jpg


200-L.jpg


Panerai Radomir Rattrapante (this one is gone)

249-L.jpg


265-L.jpg


113-L.jpg


257-L.jpg


243-L.jpg


110-L.jpg


119-L.jpg
 
for the 3 people who sent me emails through the system here on the forums, i've received them all, but you are obviously not getting my replies when i write you back at your included emails.

please write me directly: zremy007@yahoo.com and i will be glad to reply to all your questions

i encourage you guys to become gold members at the least if you plan on staying on the forums, makes transactions much easier
 
looks like the Rolex replica is sold, pending funds, sold it to a local FL guy, i think he's really going to like it, of course he has the right to come back here and post if it's to his expectations once he gets it.

I would like to sell the Bell & Ross if someone's interested, i'll take some more pics tomorrow in the day time and post them here
 
Last edited:
looks like the Rolex replica is sold, pending funds, sold it to a local FL guy, i think he's really going to like it, of course he has the right to come back here and post if it's to his expectations once he gets it.

to those who also asked questions, i will place a small order for me, from Gunther, probably on monday, if anyone wants something, let me now... i'm pretty sure the quality is going to be as good as it gets, at least on any of the ones i already had i can vouch for that. I know they offer any popular make/model from Rolex, Omega, Panerai, Uboat, B&R, Breitling, Hublot, A&P etc

I have a ton of pics from him with the models they make, he sends me pics all the time. If anyone has a specific watch in mind you can email me anytime and i'll ask him, or send you a pic if it's something he already has.

I would like to sell the Bell & Ross if someone's interested, i'll take some more pics tomorrow in the day time and post them here

So BFC is allowing counterfeit watches to be shilled here now? Am I reading this correctly?
 
robino: If this watch was sterile (no names), I'd absolutely love it. That it reads Rolex, now matter HOW quality it is, is still bad form. Rolex would not approve.

The BF community abhors counterfeit knives. How do the watch forums regard these? Real question.

Jim
 
I think the proper term to use, at least the terms used on timezone and watchuseek forums is "Homage" , not replica or fake......
 
well, no sweat off my ba...

i was just trying to help out those who wanted a nice reproduction who couldn't afford, or wouldn't pay $9500 for a Deep Sea dweller.
i love watches but would never, even if i had 10K pay that for a watch i might scratch or drop or...so i got lucky to find a very well made replica, using eta movements that rolex/omega themselves used and use still...

i sold mine, so if the BF community is against selling a fake watch, so be it, just trying to help.
i'll just buy them for myself and not worry about anyone else then.

those who want one, don't have to contact me here anyway, i'll help out if i can.

SharpByCoop...

yes, you'd be surprised how many real authentic watch owners own good replicas (not those quartz or junk autos you see 99% of the time) but well made replicas.
I have a friend overseas who has over a couple exotic cars and always wears a 40,000 Audemars Piguet on his wrist. He too owns well made replica watches and when i asked him just why would he, knowing he can damn well afford authentics, he said "if i banged this AP against a door going into a restaurant, i would cry, so i wear it only when i know i'm going to places where 300 people might mingle with me, the rest of the time i wear my replica so i don't care when something bad happens"

I've read up on a few replica forums since buying these watches, there are a huge number of authentic watch owners who also own replicas and those are the biggest die hard fans of well made replicas, cause they have an authentic watch to compare it against and they appreciate the quality that goes into a well made replica more than the guy who can't afford a real one and doesn't have an authentic version to compare against.

It's a touchy subject, I would imagine, especially to those who spend tens of thousands for a real watch, to see that someone can buy a very well made version of what's on their wrist for a fraction of a fraction of the cost. There's guys on the replica forums that have these watches for 5 or more years and without any problems and while they might not be good at 1000m they are good at 100m and i highly doubt 99% of whomever buys them needs them to go deeper than that.

It ain't for everybody, that i know and it's obvious some here are even trying to ruin the fun for everyone else.

I'm out.

those who might be interested in the Bell & Ross i still have can email me for pics, i took a bunch of new pics today but won't post them here anymore.
I also have other pics from other models that i was emailed by Gunther for those interested.
 
robino: If this watch was sterile (no names), I'd absolutely love it. That it reads Rolex, now matter HOW quality it is, is still bad form. Rolex would not approve.


Jim

what's funny...
A friend worked in Dubai for a few months and when he came back he was telling me stories of their malls...

in any of their malls, they have the authentic Rolex store and right besides it, a store that sells replicas.

I suppose they don't have laws there that protect the brand against contraband...and he said the store next to Rolex was full while Rolex was empty, and we're talking about a place in that everyone who lives there is a millionaire.
 
So BFC is allowing counterfeit watches to be shilled here now? Am I reading this correctly?

these were my personal items, selling them like everyone else sells their stuff, i do believe i've seen a few other posts with people selling replica watches and nothing on the books said it was against the rules so...

i've since edited my posts to remove anything i've said that might promote interest in any replica watches other than what i personally had f/s.
 
^^ A well-founded answer. Thank you.

I understand, but there is a 'however'... The ones who can truly validate owning the homage with the name are those who already suppported the OEM brand with their original purchase.

Those of us (I'll include myself) who choose not to afford the high end originals aren't buying a backup; we're buying a replica.

It IS a personal choice. I agree.

I bought off a seller on eBay a Panerai sterile homage with no name. It's real quality, as yours is, with an ETA2497 movement and good parts. It just doesn't say Panerai. I
'justified' this because I learned the original design was started by Rolex and sold to Panerai. Thus, it's not a 100% design owned by Panerai? I may be dead wrong, but that'
s how I interpreted it.

This is a good discussion to have although your FS post is NOT the place to do so. I apologize.

Fair enough.

Jim
 
these were my personal items, selling them like everyone else sells their stuff, i do believe i've seen a few other posts with people selling replica watches and nothing on the books said it was against the rules so...

i've since edited my posts to remove anything i've said that might promote interest in any replica watches other than what i personally had f/s.

The post I quoted you on above indicates you are offering to procure them for other persons.

That is not selling your personal items.

That is dealing in counterfeit merchandise. Trademark infringement and counterfeiting are criminal as well as civil matters, and the rules here pretty clearly take a position on such things as using BFC as a platform for engaging in a criminal enterprise.

I'm delighted to see you offer that you've no commercial interest in this, but very frankly Sir, when you indicate that "Gunther" will create any "replica" one desires, Gunther is engaging in counterfeiting and you are promoting it here by your post.

I doubt highly that Rolex with their entire floor of atty's dedicated to trademark infringement would see it any differently.

Counterfeiting is theft, period. It is the intention to pass off a fake as the real deal.

You may be as poetic as you like about it.

There's little difference except you'd get to use slightly different vocabulary in a disposition.

You may wish to remove the entire post and throw up an apology for your error instead.

Or you may prefer that the Rolex guys find this thread and start leaning on you and frankly Spark, as the owner of BFC, instead.

Your choice.

Just to clarify something for you, if it says Rolex, Gucci, Prada, or CRKT on it and is not, it's an inferior product.

It may well have a good movement in it. Might be a good casing and back. May have excellent workmanship.

But the moment you try to hold it out as a genuine real deal designer watch, wallet or purse and it's not, you've engaged in trademark infringement and fraud. You're dealing in counterfeit merchandise. Selling a real-deal watch will not land you in a lawsuit or the back of a police car.

And if you try passing it off as a replica, a VERY thin guise indeed, as noted, they have no intrinsic value.

So yes, the fake is an inferior product.

You're welcome to rationalize this however you like.

It is important to note that some of these trademarked designer folks DO take their trademark protection seriously and as such, you should be thinking that through, instead of telling the world that this is not a big deal.

Call it friendly advice.
 
thanks for the concern, however, mine is sold so they can come over for coffee, i'll entertain them all they want.

i'm sure instead of coming after me, on a watch that's already gone, they got literally HUNDREDS of replica watch forums they can work on all day long and visit each of the thousands of members who buy and sell hundreds of these on a regular basis.

So i think you're making a big deal out of nothing really. Maybe you own a $9200 Deep sea and are just upset that you could'a had one JUST LIKE IT for $500 i don't know...that's your problem.

This one is sold, for all i care the mods can flush this thread along with your attny. like reply.

Again, thanks for your 'friendly advice' Sir.

PS - I wonder if all those guys who have bought Porsche 356, 550 spyder and Cobra replicas know they are also driving inferior products. Maybe you should write and tell them
 
Last edited:
Robino

Maybe you own a $9200 Deep sea and are just upset that you could'a had one JUST LIKE IT for $500

No they wouldn't have one just like it. As any Rolex owner, Jeweler, Pawn Shop owner, etc. would be able to tell you.

I own a Deep Sea...have Gunther send me one and I will catalog all the difference between mine and a fake in this thread.

To Parker's point. Yes you can call it what you want or not give a rats ass....you are dealing in counterfeit merchandise. As well you (in public) are telling people you will willingly and knowingly break the law and traffic in counterfeit goods. You might not care....but somebody else might.

I guess the question for the moderators is does BF allow counterfeit merchandise to be sold here? I don't know which is why I am asking.
 
I own a Deep Sea...have Gunther send me one and I will catalog all the difference between mine and a fake in this thread.

for a couple of watch fans you guys don't get around much...
google replica watch forums and surf any of them, you'll find numerous authentic Deep Sea dweller owners who have done just that, side by side photos, measurements, digi scale weights and a lot more...there are a LOT of watch smiths on those forums and they are bigger critics than most of us here would be.

Gunther has said that some replica factories will re-design their watch 2 or 3 times before getting it as close as possible, a lot of buyers and again, these guys are by the thousands, search for yourself and you'll see...a lot of the people who buy these are indeed watch smiths, and authentic owners alike who have both models to compare and post the results for all to see. I think you'll get your answer on pretty much any of the 50 replica watch forums as you aren't the first one to think about matching your authentic watch to one or more replicas.

I never said the quality is similar, i've said the authentic watch might be good to 1000m or 10,000m - and the fake will only be good to 100m so what? I'm not going any deeper with a watch on my wrist, those who are i'm sure will purchase the $10,000 watch

I'm not here to argue against any of you guys, you're right, your 10,000 dollar watch IS BETTER, MUCH BETTER. Never claimed otherwise. But not everyone is a magazine editor who can afford a 10K watch.

Little ol' me is just here trying to sell a fricking watch i wore, that's all. Pull your panties out of your butts and chill, if you think this replica is going to hurt your Rolex values rest easy, there are literally thousands of people right now, buying fake Rolexes at this exact moment, one more ain't gonna make a difference.

A lot of you probably wished you drove a replica Cobra cause you just don't have a million laying around for a real authentic one, but you don't see that as hypocritical cause you don't own a real Cobra.
 
Wearing a Counterfeit watch is telling the world you are a wannabe.

I don't buy the "I wanna keep my real watch pristine" crap.

Having a fake Rolex on my wrist is the same as wearing a fake Timex, at the end of the day they are still both Counterfeits.................
 
It's a shame that the Chinese don't respect copyrights, trademarks and brand names. They don't play fair and buying this stuff just plays into their hands.

We should use this as a reason to revoke their favored trading status.

I happen to own an authentic Rolex Sub and would never go with a fake, no matter how good a copy it was. That's just me. The Chinese innovate very little and rip off whatever they want.
 
everyone has been copying each other, japanese car makers copy BMW and Benz designs all the time, their design team lacks vision, so they copy the hard work of the germans/italians...

look at knifes, there's no less than about 100 makers who copy the Loveless design, should we be upset and stop buying them? Let's all just dish out $5K for a real Loveless why don't we.

there's a ton of analogies i can make about copying a design, i do agree that putting the name on what they copy goes over the line. I just like the quality of the copies and love the prices, especially when they're so close to the real deal. I can see why someone with a real authentic watch might be pissed, most people who wear a Rolex get the question "is it a real one" all the time...

It is what it is, many things in life are copied, knives, guns, cars, watches, clothing, homes, etc etc etc... everyone's a wanna be i guess, except for those who will pay 10 grand for the real deal. I paid 9500 less and feel just fine about it.
 
One things for sure, it's against forum rules for people to disrupt a sales thread. If you have an issue, it should go to the mods...not trash the OP's thread. He made it clear they were homages, so no foul intent was implied.

For the "ethics police" to jump the guy, because they paid 10k for their's...is uncalled for.

I'm a TAG & Breitling guy, or I'd be interested :)
 
The perspective I get from all of this is just how difficult it must be to buy a used Rolex and be
confident it's genuine. WatchTime magazine did an article on fake Rolex a couple of years and
while the differences were discernable when a REAL watch was available for comparison, almost
no one could spot them on the fake by itself. I would never attempt to buy a pre-owned Rolex
from a private party without an inspection from a watchmaker I could trust.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top