I've seen quite a few.....
Maker's marks are actually MUCH more than a simple identifier for posterity. It is an
opportunity. (Lost on many).
At a glance it's your business card and gives a quick insight into your artistry and forethought.
Value to the knife and maker:
Poor: At worst, if it's done poorly in execution or design it detracts from value and makes a good artisan look poor. (See post above who won't buy from subjective mark designs. It's the buyers who decide in the end, not the makers.)
Neutral: Done clearly and cleanly it's a neutral means of keeping your name present. This is where the majority of maker's reside.
Positive: Done cleanly, with forethought it is a chance to ADD value into a knife. Each of those 'clever' marks you have identified have something 'special' about them. That didn't just happen. There was intentional.
For me the one thing I hate on a knife is a poorly executed name mark. If you are going to use an etch then be sure that the mark is crisp and clean. Badly etched name marks are awful. The same applies to stamps.
Personally I think that insofar as name marks are concerned less is more. And a clear name is always better than some obscure logo.
^^^
Nailed it! I privately cringe when I see a noted mark with a half etched name. (I privately talked to John Young about this one year because his marks were getting sloppy. He listened with intent and made a change. They have been crisp since.)
Every material has different etching needs, I'd suggest experimenting on new finishes or steels. Obviously when some get it perfect and others have blotchy patterns in the text, the method they are using is inferior. Do it better, it's in plain view.
Simple is good. Subtlety is fantastic. Clever may have them cheering or it may bite you. You have to be careful.
The logo or mark is RARELY a static never changing thing. A good artist will review and change small things over time. There are pages devoted to Loveless logo changes in his career. Please look over your marks to see where you are in this continuum.
I read with interest brownshoe's points about why he
didn't think a mark was needed in many cases. His remarks were deleted in another thread, and I WISH he'd say it again, although I don't blame him if he stood away.
Coke brings a viewpoint as varied as a mark in itself. Even if I don't completely agree, I find his words interesting to understand. Why so harsh?
Obviously I am not only familiar with the subject, I just went through the logo/mark process myself.
Good thread.