You're lost in the woods...

First of all, being limited to ONE knife IS a survival situation.

Currently, my Swamp Rat Camp Tramp.

In a couple of weeks/months, if they ever come out, possibly the Bark River North Star.
 
Ed Fowler camp knife.

The reasoning would be it was made for this type of endeavor, it can be sharpened on a smooth rock anywhere, holds an edge a good long time and has a guard to prevent injuries while in use.

Brownie
 
I'd take my SwampRat BattleRat with my paracord wrapped handle and special transdimensional mobarity warp inducer on the lanyard.
 
Hey guys, just to correct a typo on some websites, the SOG Seal Revolvers have AUS 8 steel in the blades, including the newest models, Hunter and Double Action.

Robbie Roberson ;)
 
i thought about it a little and i'd like to narrow it down to my chax keemosabe 8'er. it's the best all around and it's perfectly balanced. i have alot of confidence in that blade!
 
Robbie Roberson said:
to correct a typo on some websites, the SOG Seal Revolvers have AUS 8 steel in the blades
I stand corrected. Thank you for straightening out that point, Robbie.
 
Randall Made model 2 8" with the commando grip, one edge for chopping and the other for work that requires a really sharp edge. Just hope that I don't find myself in said situation for another 3 1/2 years. No saw, that could pose a problem. Going to think on this one a little more.
 
I too would have to say Becks WSK.

Now One thing you have to keep in mind is you can order it with the small companion knife. And thier sheaths can be attached to act and one package. Does that count?
 
Why this obsession with large fixed blades? Anyone who has done any serious, multi-day, "carry-all-your-own-kit" hiking knows that weight is your enemy. Having completed more than one long distance trail, I've never seen the need for more than an SAK.

What do you plan to do with a Trailmaster or an 18" kukri? Fell redwoods? Gralloch a T. Rex?

Most of what you'll need to do is open food packets, open tins, lance blisters, pick out splinters, cut string, stir food. If really pushed, you might need to whittle a tent peg or carve a fuzz stick.

A SAK gives you versatility; also all of the cutting power you'll need for 99.9% of the tasks you might have to perform.

A large, heavy FB is a one-trick pony.

maximus otter
 
I’m afraid I would be the one with the “un-cool” choice. I would have the same pocketknife I’ve carried for years, a Case, slim line trapper and my one-piece hatchet. I think I could handle most tasks with them.
 
My Busse Steel Heart Variant. It's flat ground 1/4" infi with a symmetrical "V" edge and a great point. I've never owned a knife that I would trust more.
 
Since I'm down to one knife (and based on the way the original question was posed) it would be one of my EDC knives. Out in the sticks not worrying about sheeple over-reacting, it would probably be a Benchmade AFCK (806D2).

Depending on my mood that day, however, it could also be a SAK Champion (not to be confused with the Swiss Champ) in a belt pouch. The Champion is smaller than the SC but with plenty of tools that are really useful. I don't believe it's still in production; however, I liked it so much I bought two and still own the spare NIB.
 
maximus otter said:
Why this obsession with large fixed blades? Anyone who has done any serious, multi-day, "carry-all-your-own-kit" hiking knows that weight is your enemy. Having completed more than one long distance trail, I've never seen the need for more than an SAK.

What do you plan to do with a Trailmaster or an 18" kukri? Fell redwoods? Gralloch a T. Rex?

Most of what you'll need to do is open food packets, open tins, lance blisters, pick out splinters, cut string, stir food. If really pushed, you might need to whittle a tent peg or carve a fuzz stick.

A SAK gives you versatility; also all of the cutting power you'll need for 99.9% of the tasks you might have to perform.

A large, heavy FB is a one-trick pony.

maximus otter

Yeah, well alot of the recommendations on here are more fantasy then reality, but I think that most people on the general forum have little to no outdoor expereince and that this is just for fun. If this was a serious question it would be posed in the outdoor forums. :)

I think you are correct about a SAK being a great choice for the outdoors. I myself have a Victorinox Camper that goes everywhere with me. The saw and blades can truly handle alot of the cutting. That said, this thread wasn't about which knife you would choose for a day hike, but which knife you would choose for survival.

In a survival situation a SAK is great, but doesn't do most tasks as easily as a small 3.5-5" fixed blade. A survival knife will be called upon to skin big game, small game, build shelters, create fuzz sticks, baton through thick branches, create other tools and weapons, build traps, and even meal preparation. Now could a SAK do all of the above? Absolutely, but not as easily as a Scandi, Dozier, Bark River, etc. A SAK would be, and is, a great companion to a 3.5-5" fixed blade. I wouldn't want to have to use it exclusively though. ;)

There are alot of WORSE choices then a SAK though. I would rather have a SAK then any of these:
1. Tactical Folder
2. Extra Large 9+" fixed blade
3. Prybar Fixed blade
4. Khukri
5. Multi-tool
-Kevin
 
This is Mission:Impossible! Me and with one knife!!!! Impossible!!!
I do not think I would get lost, but I intend to travel to isolated places in future. I will definitely take a few SAKs (part of them will be confiscated by my family anyway :D ) , Spyderco Delica and something what law will permit. Busse will be illegal in places where I intend to travel, so probably I will have an axe instead.
Regards,
 
Yeah, well alot of the recommendations on here are more fantasy then reality,

Thank you, Morgoth. My point exactly.

The one time I was actually lost in the woods, a GPS would have been of more use to me than all the knives mentioned in this thread put together. This was long before the civilian version of GPS was available, and yes, I had a compass, and yes, I knew how to use it. But I was hunting, not orienteering. These days, if I'm out of sight of the car, I have my GPS.

As has been mentioned, getting lost in the woods could mean a lot of different things, but I will suggest some things it's likely to mean. You are tired. You are thirsty and probably hungry. You were planning on being back at camp, or your truck, before long, but it isn't happening. You are dazed and confused, trying to figure out how it is that just a few minutes ago you were having a grand time doing whatever it was you came to the woods to do, and now two and two don't make four and you're not where you thought you were, and the day is getting on. Getting lost doesn't just happen to you, it's something you do to yourself, as you suddenly discover, and so you're at least a little annoyed at yourself and, truth be told, more than a little nervous.

Now, the standard fantasy calls for our intrepid woodsman to draw his trusty blade and provide himself with a modest but snug log cabin, a few pieces of rustic furniture, a bow and a dozen or so arrows, a spear for fishing, and a half cord of fire wood. By mid-afternoon. Then the only decision that confronts him is trout or venison for dinner, after which he will settle down in his bed, nicely tired from his labors, and fall asleep congratulating himself on his selection of the perfect blade for this "survival" chore.

Bull.

The reality is that our intrepid woodsman is distracted to no end, not to say scared sh**less. The last thing he needs to do is "make chips fly." Even if he were inclined to do this, it would be stupid of him. He needs to conserve energy, not waste it.

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, I posted the reference to Aron Ralston and his ordeal to make a point. Young Mr. Ralston had a hell of a job to do, and he did it, not with some megablade costing hundreds of dollars but with a no-name cheapo multitool blade that nobody who posts on this site would be caught dead with (perhaps that's an unfortunate turn of phrase), that was DULLED by his own attempt to free himself. Yet he did it. The moral of the story is, a sharp mind and a dull blade beats a dull mind and a sharp blade every time.
 
Back
Top