I don't know if your comments above are associated with my response as it seems you enjoy being the antagonist. Regardless, I'd recommend you not get too caught up in assumptions until you handle one.
Huh. I wouldn't have come up with
antagonist, more just cursed with a weird sense of humor and a tendency sometimes to write the first thing that comes into my head. But perhaps I should dial it back a bit. Sorry if I've caused anyone any annoyance.
In any case, I wrote what I did in reaction to what I perceived as a hopeful sounding suggestion (which you were, in turn, also responding to) that maybe this new knife might "wave". I was trying to convey, "gee, I sure hope it doesn't, because that would be bad," (I've always regarded the "wave" mechanism as, uh, the opposite of a feature - YMMV) but I was not passing judgement on whether this knife does or does not wave. Actually, "waving" doesn't feel much like something RHK would design for, and given their past work I don't expect the knife would come out the door doing something Rick had not intended (I see Hinderer knives operating so reliably and predictably in the hand - flipping open completely, locking up solidly, keeping fingers off the blade, having a very secure hand position - as being one of their strongest points - I carry one because it's a knife I can rely upon).
Scrutinizing pictures, as I did earlier in the thread, can only go so far; I'm looking forward to hearing the reports that will be posted here by the first folks to handle them at TKI (not me, sadly), to get a better idea of how they perform (my first XM-18 was - at that point - by far the most I'd ever spent on a knife, and I bought it on the basis of years of reviews, reputation, and pictures online, without ever touching one first - a leap of faith that I'm really glad I took).