CONTACT HAS BEEN MADE with Spark.
Okey doke, here we go. If Buck is chosen, we have to make sure that all 250 are sold/pre-sold to the forum. Spark does not want any excess sold for profit or mark up or even showing up on our site or any others. It changes only one thing for SK, and that is if Buck is chosen, then we'll have to fill the pre-order of 250 prior to the order of the knives. SK won't be able to sell any leftovers of any kind. What say you members of the forum?
I think this is probably the best way of doing it either way. I think it would be better and more secure to do a "MassDrop" style pre-order in which people commit to purchase if a certain number of people commit to purchase. As in you give your credit card / bank info and it isn't charged until at least 249 other people also enter their payment information and commit to the purchase.
First, let me express my thanks and appreciation for all you are doing here. I am sure that I speak for many here that your efforts are noted and very much valued.
Guaranteeing the pre-sale of 250 knives can be tricky. Last year, we had a TC Barlow for our forum knife and the odds were quite certain that they would sell out, and they most certainly did. But that is the nature of a TC Barlow... Your polling in terms of what Buck pattern to offer with whatever materials it is to be constructed with might give you a better gauge on whether you have any certainty towards covering that number of 250. If a Buck is selected, I will likely be in for multiples, especially if it is a pattern that speaks to me.
But still, filling 250 pre-orders prior to placing the order seems to be a bit of a risk. I am not sure how you would mitigate that. Get everyone's commitment prior to taking money? If you can't fill 250 orders then the whole thing is a wash? What happens when folks back out when it comes time to pony up? Just seems there are a lot of logistics that are in question.
Well if we as a forum believe it would be tricky, and after making the pre-order live if it looks as if we'll have trouble then we can take the initiative as a forum and try to distribute knowledge of the group order and try to get less regular members or other knife enthusiasts who don't post here to buy in also. Yes, it's ideal to only have forum regulars buy the knives but if we want to make it happen we'll have to branch out. Obviously last year's knife was not only bought by regulars of the porch.
You've nailed it on the head and rubber needs to meet the road. GEC needs a champion with a wallet. As of right now, it's just a nice thought. Does anyone want to take on the challenge of funding and logistics for a GEC knife?
I don't think funding it out of one's own pocket is really the best way for this to go. It is awesome that @waynorth Charlie and @gunstockjack Barry have taken it upon themselves in the past, and very selfless being that it is not for profit, but I don't know that we can ask a dealer (or especially a private individual) to foot the bill without profit for a full size SFO that in every other case could be very profitable with the same financial risk.
I voted, but am curious to know if Buck would make the 301 as a "Texas Jack" ie. a two-blade Jack on the same frame. Clip and sheepfoot blades maybe?
In the usual course of events, it's easier for most cutleries to do a two-blade Jack, hence less costly.
I am certainly in favor of that!