Willie71
Warren J. Krywko
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2013
- Messages
- 12,214
The problem isn't an 'advanced' KITH. The problem is an 'advanced' KITH is being proposed, which necessarily implies exclusion but without any defined rigid terms, parameters and/or rules.
Refer to my earlier post about who decides such things and why they're qualified to do so and who's excluded etc.
And even IF you can figure those things out, you take a simple and fun event and make it way too much work and way overcomplicated.
Hence.........train wreck.
I get your point. (The therapist in me is coming out trying to clarify things, lol.) for example, when I did it years ago, it was based on a few design parameters, 5”+ blade, hidden tang, no reclaimed steel (unless you know how to test steel, at minimum finding optimum austenitizing temp as verified by Rc#’s), no home made micarta, or paracord wrap in lieu of a properly designed handle, and verified heat treat, either temp control and Rc tested, or send it out. I suggested minimum 400g satin finish on the blade.
I was quite inexperienced at that point, and had only been on the forums 7 months iirc, making knives for 1.5 years, and much of the backlash may have been d/t no one really knowing me. I strongly stated JS or MS level finish was not required, but no obvious flaws. I had a few grind marks peek out after etching the hamon, so I didn’t even really meet my own criterion, but the feedback I got was great. I got pointers on how to better finish a blade, and have applied that ever since. I did a raised clip 6.5” fighter with an s-guard, cocobolo sculpted handle, and 1095 blade with hamon. I got feedback on the high quality of my handle work, which really helped too.
The top knife is the one I’m talking about.
ttps://flic.kr/p/hPvW9Y]
I’d love a do over on it. It wasn’t my first hamon, my first hidden tang, or first s-guard. No way would this knife pass a JS test, but it had the design elements.