The op asked what is the difference
I’ll try and sum it up
I work most the major knife shows and I am privileged to see many many knives
Lots of makers bring me their work at the shows to critique and offer advise
If someone brought me a knife built like the Brend I would not have much to say negative about fit and finish
If a maker brought me a knife built like the Randall I would be all over it with negative comments
I would encourage him to work on the fit and finish
This is the truth
I was responding to why the Brend was different compared to the Randall
Be honest if any of you commissioned a custom from a well known maker and it came in and looked like the pictures above yo might not be pleased but since it’s a Randall it is dismissed
Not being a knife snob just being honest
OK, I'll put this out there and am willing to learn, if you are willing to teach (and I'll love these blades regardless)...
Here are my two Randalls, a 5-6 and a 12-9 14; they were bought to be used hiking and camping, so I opted for single quillion, as that suits me best. The balance on the 12-9 is a little tip heavy in normal grip, and neutral when held with the choil. There is a distal taper, but nothing too dramatic--which is fine, my needs are not for a fighter/ kabober of organs per se, but rather for enough tip strength to do some light prying, carving, making divots, etc...
These two have clean lines and well made jimping (unlike photo above); while I recognize the attention to detail and exceedingly precise craftsmanship of the Brend, Bagwell, and other knives posted, the notion that these are crude production knives, I contend, is erroneous... again, respectfully. The 12-9 is a non-catalog knife, and it's options arguably make it a custom (it even has a compass in the butt). Even the 5-6 is somewhat custom, as the model 5 has to be ordered with blade length (among other things) specified by the buyer.
Now, did I buy these because they were Randalls, and thus paid more for the name, idea, legacy, history, etc. Sure. Would I buy the Brend, maybe, but not that one... if it had a single quillion, slightly different blade profile, desert ironwood scales, and was marked by the Stars and Stripes instead of the Stars and Bars (I've had too many family members and friends serve the Stars and Stripes to fly any other colors), maybe... but then again, I just got all I was looking for with the Randalls. So, I'm good.
The refinements that you will likely point out, and likely rightly so, may mark the finer points of construction... but the finer points do not translate into value added for me, thus, I pass. The case is otherwise for those particular Randalls. My only issue is the term "crude" (or production knife for that matter) applied to the Randalls. I just do not find it accurate (but no offense taken, once again)... just being honest as well.
Sorry for the crappy cell phone pics:
What would you say about this one form Lon Humphrey?