IMO, the vast majority of them are.
And most of the rest are 4th rate Bob Loveless makers. :thumbdn:
And I have a fair number of their knives to prove it . . .
. . . and a few knives that were made by some of the few (IMO) first rate Bob Loveless makers. :thumbup:
What about us 5th and 6th rate Bob Loveless makers?
Don't we get a mention?
Here's the thing that's always confused me....why does a STYLE of knife have to be a near perfect copy of the original?
Serge using the 'wrong' steel for his tactical and being a 2nd or 3rd rate Virgil England, etc is utter rubbish. I'm sure Serge used which steel he wanted and made it how he wanted....after all, the name on the blade clearly says 'Serge'.
I've had similar comments on here and other forums about my agricultural Loveless STYLE knives....wrong steel, wrong grind, wrong shape, wrong type of makers mark, wrong materials, wrong proportions, etc, etc.
I love making what I make, I like using the 'wrong' steel as I like to HT it myself. In any case, I don't always have the spare cash to use high end stainless then pay someone else to HT it for me, nor to buy the equipment to do it myself.
I flat grind as I only have a grinder with a flat platen, once again, not enough spare cash for a nice set up with various sized contact wheels.
As a result, you end up with a knife in roughly the same basic shape as a Loveless but certainly not even close to a Loveless/Lovett/Lin/Johnson/Vestal/Buchanan/Brown, etc (delete as applicable

)
I'm happy with what I make, as I'm sure Serge and all the other makers who post on here are with what they make....why else would we put them on here for all to see? If we were ashamed of them in any way we'd keep a huge stash of knives locked away out of sight wouldn't we?
People should take things for what they are, not what they think they should be.
Serge, my apologies for derailing your thread.
Ian