- Joined
- Sep 27, 2004
- Messages
- 3,041
I dont think the problem is purely in strider-hate or strider-love. its shared. The main thing ive seen here thats different for strider is that when anyone, and i mean ANYONE posts anything even remotely negative about strider, a huge slew of strider-luvahs show up and basically attack the poster insinuating that:
1. they shouldnt have posted.
2. they should have got it fixed by strider and that strider fixes everything without questions.
3. they are a strider-hater and how pathetic it is to hate striders
4. BF hates striders and its a conspiracy
5. they created the problem themself, or a third party willfully created the flaw for no reason
The reality is that none of the threads would escalate unless that happened. its as if many people think consumers owe it to strider to never make any flaws public. A buyer who gets a bad knife owes nothing to the company since technically the company has their hard earned money and they have a faulty product. Fixing those flaws isnt a wonderful, great addition to their service...its basic business practice. Any knifemaker who wont fix a flawed knife shouldnt be in the business. Belive it or not, just because a company repeatedly fixes flaws in sold knives doesnt mean thats a good thing...it just means they are doing what they should on that end of their business.
The fault doenst just lie in strider-haters pocket, though. Sure, lots jump on the bandwagon when topics come up....why? i hate to say it but maybe its because a higher percentage of strider lovers use phrases such as "f-tard", "poser" and such. You rarely see that outside W&C except in some of the aformentioned strider threads. Dont even bother hitting any of the strider-friendly or supported forums....its like walking into an adolescent vulgarity contest and the majority of talk about BF is in regards to how queer everyone here is...So i would agree that Strider gets jumped all over, but i think you need to look a little further than BF to see the cause of that.....
The "hardcore tools for hardcore individuals" doesnt help either. Its pretty easy to jump all over the image that strider associates with their knives since it rivals and mirrors the mall-ninja style, regardless of if the knives themselves might be above par. The tough part of that is that a percentage of people who by striders then actually think they are hardcore individuals because of the knife and look at things like poor fit and finish as almost a selling point. how many times have you seen mentioned "i would never buy a knife thats too pretty to use....no problem with striders, though!" Just because a knife looks good doesnt mean you can't use it. you shouldnt need to buy ugly knives just to entice you to actually use them.
So yeah, i think strider gets jumped on. probably more than they deserve. but that doesnt mean those attacks are simply out of the blue. While we might need to look at ourselves and figure out why we react the way we do, you need to look at some of the other factors and figure out why we do, as well.
I will personally say that I havent met Mick Strider but have handled his knives both custom and production. The ones i saw were raw and uncomfortable, but just because i dont love their style doesnt mean they aren't good tools for the right job. I would say that I have more of a beef with how Mick handles himself and how his followers handle themselves than with the knives. its nearly impossible to separate the two, though, for obvious reasons.
1. they shouldnt have posted.
2. they should have got it fixed by strider and that strider fixes everything without questions.
3. they are a strider-hater and how pathetic it is to hate striders
4. BF hates striders and its a conspiracy
5. they created the problem themself, or a third party willfully created the flaw for no reason
The reality is that none of the threads would escalate unless that happened. its as if many people think consumers owe it to strider to never make any flaws public. A buyer who gets a bad knife owes nothing to the company since technically the company has their hard earned money and they have a faulty product. Fixing those flaws isnt a wonderful, great addition to their service...its basic business practice. Any knifemaker who wont fix a flawed knife shouldnt be in the business. Belive it or not, just because a company repeatedly fixes flaws in sold knives doesnt mean thats a good thing...it just means they are doing what they should on that end of their business.
The fault doenst just lie in strider-haters pocket, though. Sure, lots jump on the bandwagon when topics come up....why? i hate to say it but maybe its because a higher percentage of strider lovers use phrases such as "f-tard", "poser" and such. You rarely see that outside W&C except in some of the aformentioned strider threads. Dont even bother hitting any of the strider-friendly or supported forums....its like walking into an adolescent vulgarity contest and the majority of talk about BF is in regards to how queer everyone here is...So i would agree that Strider gets jumped all over, but i think you need to look a little further than BF to see the cause of that.....
The "hardcore tools for hardcore individuals" doesnt help either. Its pretty easy to jump all over the image that strider associates with their knives since it rivals and mirrors the mall-ninja style, regardless of if the knives themselves might be above par. The tough part of that is that a percentage of people who by striders then actually think they are hardcore individuals because of the knife and look at things like poor fit and finish as almost a selling point. how many times have you seen mentioned "i would never buy a knife thats too pretty to use....no problem with striders, though!" Just because a knife looks good doesnt mean you can't use it. you shouldnt need to buy ugly knives just to entice you to actually use them.
So yeah, i think strider gets jumped on. probably more than they deserve. but that doesnt mean those attacks are simply out of the blue. While we might need to look at ourselves and figure out why we react the way we do, you need to look at some of the other factors and figure out why we do, as well.
I will personally say that I havent met Mick Strider but have handled his knives both custom and production. The ones i saw were raw and uncomfortable, but just because i dont love their style doesnt mean they aren't good tools for the right job. I would say that I have more of a beef with how Mick handles himself and how his followers handle themselves than with the knives. its nearly impossible to separate the two, though, for obvious reasons.