Now let me thank Frank, for summing up my opinion on the commentary. Nobody here is
telling any maker how to run their business, but they might learn something from the views that are discussed in this open forum. Free enterprise and freedom of speech are something we all pride ourselves on.
I'd like to comment on Bastid's statement regarding Bill Moran. What he does is a
PUBLIC SERVICE . Anyone with half a brain knows that he is not attending shows to sell knives. He is there to promote the industry, makers, and collectors. He is a gentleman who gives a flying patootie, and hopefully is enjoying a bit of what he helped create. Perhaps the same could be said of Ron Lake and Bob Loveless, and I'm sure others that don't readily come to mind. Somehow I don't think these gentlemen have to worry about "pre-sales"

!
Perhaps the question should be posed a bit differently. Rather that speaking about "moral obligations" (hey this is business, he who gets the last buck wins), we should ask does pre-selling adversely effect the maker/collector experience? Does it adversely effect the outcome of the show? Does it hurt the hobby/industry as a whole?
Let's go back to one of my origional statements. If a maker DOES pre-sell why can't he
AT LEAST stipulate that the knife stays on the table until the end of the show? Chances are, he'll find the dealer a buyer and who the hell can argue with that?!
