- Joined
- Oct 3, 1998
- Messages
- 4,842
Like Ken, I like the idea of a knife that's comfortable, secure, and useable in any grip, including pakal. That's not only because the stress of a defensive situation might cause me to grab the knife in the "wrong" grip, but because as we already know, most knives carried for defensive use will at some point or other be used for utility use. Might as well accept it, and make it useable in standard forward grip for the reason. A dedicated pakal fighter doesn't need this feature (viz. the Disciple), but I do very much like the idea of a pakal fighter that is useable in any grip, and I think it can be designed without giving up too much.
And to show again where individual tastes lie, Ken's choice of the Perrin bowie doesn't feel good to me in either saksak or pakal. In forward grip, the very deep and sudden index finger groove makes my grip feel very odd. In pakal, the meat of my palm sinks in uncomfortably. I feel that deep transitions, like too-deep index finger grooves, are not a plus. Smoothing out the transitions can get you a lot of the security and drastically increase comfort.
The fixed-blade temp feels okay in pakal for me.
And to show again where individual tastes lie, Ken's choice of the Perrin bowie doesn't feel good to me in either saksak or pakal. In forward grip, the very deep and sudden index finger groove makes my grip feel very odd. In pakal, the meat of my palm sinks in uncomfortably. I feel that deep transitions, like too-deep index finger grooves, are not a plus. Smoothing out the transitions can get you a lot of the security and drastically increase comfort.
The fixed-blade temp feels okay in pakal for me.