Advanced Knife Machining WIP, Pointy Fighter

I’ve been a little busy today…

A little while back I asked Aldo The New Jersey Steel Barron (I think that’s his actual given name) to source for me a couple hundred pounds of high quality A2 for this project. I can’t over emphasize the importance of knowing you have a quality source for your material rather than risking cheap chicom steel, particularly for cutlery. This is why I feel that Aldo is a great resource for all of us. Try going to some place like “Flat ground” and asking for material certs for their steel or ask just who actually manufactured it, it ain’t gonna happen... Aldo found some nice Latrobe A2 and cut it into bars for me. I told him to make sure to cut it with the grain of the sheet running the length of the bar to avoid transverse weakness issues that you wouldn’t want in work of this nature and he basically told me “Well no shit Sherlock”. Some classic Aldo right there. :thumbup:

The first thing I do is saw the steel into blanks and square up the edges so all the bars are parallel and a uniform width. Then I mount some oversize soft jaws and mill a step into them rather than run these off parallels. At 13” it really is too long to be held in a single vice so I’ve ganged up two vices.

The first cut roughs the top, it is a 2” 5 flute facemill run 477 RPM (250 SFM) and 12 IPM (.005 per tooth). It is run dry. This is counter intuitive to some people, but much of the modern coated carbide lasts longer if you can run it dry. This is according to the manufacturers and I’ve confirmed it for myself. I would only run coolant on this cutter if I were having problems clearing chips.



10_zps4132e196.jpg






The next cut, a 3/8&#8221; endmill roughs the end at 300 SFM (3056 RPM) and .0015 per tooth (18.3 IPM). Ideally it would also be run dry, but I needed coolant to keep from recutting chips (which will toast a cutter faster than anything). The next cut finishes the end, also wet to keep chips clear. Now the side touching the fixed jaws and the end are accurate planes that I can use to reference in future setups. These end cuts are fed .100&#8221; deeper than the actual cut to keep the corners (the fragile part of the endmill) down in the air under the part and out of the cut. <--- That&#8217;s a real good tip for improving cutter life.

Next I rough my holes out with an old resharpened .228 drill. Some of these are pin holes, some are simply roughing out a hole so a future endmill doesn&#8217;t have to plunge in steel and one is for future fixturing. The drill is 60 SFM and .005 per rev, which is 4.6 IPM and 916 RPM, fed in one shot, no pecking.



[video=youtube_share;bGZqqo2r2Ec]http://youtu.be/bGZqqo2r2Ec[/video]




You&#8217;ll notice in the video that at these speeds and feeds there is no drama. About the only thing you can hear is the splatter of coolant, there&#8217;s no chirping or squealing. I&#8217;m feeding hard enough that the chip is breaking instead of forming long curls, which prevents birds nests. This is what it is supposed to look like. Sounds a little bit like frying bacon. I like bacon.

.280&#8221; isn&#8217;t very deep and I&#8217;m feeding hard enough to break the chip, so pecking is unnecessary and might actually be counter productive here because this material does work harden. That&#8217;s just an old used drill that I hand re-sharpened for this job. Nothing fancy, no coating, just a 118 deg HSS drill, not even cobalt or split point. It is going to drill hundreds of holes over the course of this run and run this way I predict that drill is going to be just fine at the end of the run. If you&#8217;ll buy USA made drills and feed them properly they&#8217;ll drill a lot of holes for you. If you&#8217;ll learn to resharpen them they&#8217;ll drill a lot more holes for you. I&#8217;ve probably owned that particular drill bit for 20 years because my good friend Carl gave it to me in a set when I was going to college and I still use it today. How cool is that? It is a little shorter than it used to be&#8230;

The next cut is truing up the holes going from .228 to .248 with a .125 endmill turning 150 SFM (4584 RPM) and fed 5 IPM centerline feedrate. This is full depth of cut one shot, with tangent lead in and lead out and about 10 deg over travel, the cutter is fed .020 out the back side of the part to keep the corners out of the cut. This negates most any problem with the drill walking, so the holes are now relatively accurately placed. In the days before circular interpolation you might single point bore a hole to get it in the right place.

Next I chase the holes with a ¼&#8221; endmill just to be sure. They are now truly accurately placed and I didn&#8217;t have to setup a boreing head.

Then I ream the three pin holes for accurate diameter. The .251 stubby reamer is held in a collet chuck and spinning 400 RPM and fed 10 IPM.

Why am I reaming pin holes? I can hear folks yelling at their monitors &#8220;Nate! It&#8217;s just a freakin ¼&#8221; pin hole, drill it size F and be done with it!&#8221; Trust me there is a point to my madness. When the pin holes in the tang and the scales are tight and very accurate like this you can take the scales on and off and they&#8217;ll fall back perfectly in the same place every time. This will allow me to remove the scales from the blade for tumbling or coating the blades and reinstall them without any mismatch. I will also use the accurate holes for fixturing purposes. It really isn&#8217;t much extra bother and for me the benefits are worth it.

For accurate reaming it is important to minimize runout, otherwise your hole will be bell mouthed and oversized. I measured the runout of this reamer at .0002&#8221; which is good so no tweaks are required this time. If you&#8217;re using a drill chuck and have a few thou runout you can loosen it a tad and give it a sharp tug and retighten it to tweak your reamer in. You&#8217;ll want to use an indicator for this. With a little practice you can get a reamer running in under a thou in no time with a couple little tugs.

The next step is to skeletonize the tang. As I mentioned earlier, I&#8217;m removing unnecessary weight out of the tang, but I&#8217;m choosing to leave the very end solid in order to get the knife to balance how I want it. I&#8217;m doing the machining with a ¼&#8221; endmill. I tried to cut it all in one whack rather than in steps, but this was too aggressive an approach in this material. A variable flute endmill may have done the trick here but I don&#8217;t keep those in ¼&#8221;. So instead I do it in two 1/8&#8221; steps at 2300 RPM and 9.2 IPM. The cutter is plunging in holes that I already drilled. Tip: when possible plunge in air, center cutting endmills will plunge in steel, but it&#8217;s really not very good for them. Once you wipe the corners of your endmill out, your cutter is pretty much toast.

Skeletonized tang:

11_zpsae62fd8f.jpg
 
Last edited:
Now I finish the top. This is done wet with a 3&#8221; facemill running a single honed APET1604 insert without a wiper. It is run at 1000 SFM (1273 RPM) and fed 6.3 IPM (.005&#8221; per tooth). That&#8217;s really fast SFM in tool steel, especially since this is wet so I&#8217;m risking thermal shock in the insert. I&#8217;m only shaving off .005&#8221; for my finishing cut so there isn&#8217;t that much heat, but for sure these speeds will reduce the insert life some. I&#8217;m doing this because the high SFM will prevent BUE (built up edge) that would otherwise spoil the finish and it will also keep this cut from taking all day. As it is this takes a couple minutes.

12_zpse2946521.jpg


I'm having some trouble posting the second half of this. The forum is acting screwy tonight.

update: This is as much as it will let me post, otherwise it keeps bumping me out. This is probably due to the DDOS attacks BF is experiencing. So it looks like this WIP is finished before it got underway.

I'll try again in a few days, if it is still not working I'll move the WIP over to USN
 
Last edited:
Thanks Nathan, love your WIPs great lookin' blade, a question, have ya don't any folders yet?
 
Whoa...........................

Nuff said ( I love these WIP threads

Nathan, thanks for taking all the extra time it takes to share this process with us all.

Syn
 
Next I cut the fuller. This is for weight reduction. It is pretty wide and goes almost halfway through the work per side so it removes quite a bit of steel. It is dimensionally very similar to a 1907 pattern MKIII Enfield bayonet I have in my collection. Those are so very extra special stabby.


Old bayonet:
fuller_zps5333580f.jpg





I&#8217;m cutting this after I&#8217;ve finished the flats because running the facemill across a fuller would lead to some visible weirdness on my flats. I rough it in with a 3/8&#8221; ball fed 10 IPM and turning 3500 RPM. The SFM is relatively high because the effective cutter diameter near the center of the ball (where the actual cutting is happening here) is smaller than 3/8&#8221;. Then I finish it in two passes with a sharp new ½&#8221; stubby two flute ball endmill turning 1000 RPM and fed 5 IPM. I&#8217;m going with slow SFM here because I&#8217;m plowing and there is a lot of cutter engagement in this cut so it will be prone to chatter otherwise and I&#8217;m feeding slow to get a good surface finish. BUE is a concern, but BUE is always a concern with ballmills because the actual center SFM is zero. This is where quality cutting fluid can pay a dividend. I&#8217;m using Trim Microsol 585XT. It is designed for cast iron and titanium, but as you can see in the picture it is working pretty well for tool steel too. The cutter is a high quality coated ballmill from Lakeshore Carbide. They use a nice helical gash through the center and it cuts like a boss.


13_zps68b1a1de.jpg





Last it is time to cut my mark. What I&#8217;ve done here is I&#8217;ve signed my signature on a piece of paper and scanned it into my CAM system where I&#8217;m tracing it with a little .030&#8221; ball endmill. I set the CAM system linear deviation tolerance to .0001&#8221; to prevent any faceting. This makes for quite a lot of tiny three dimensional moves in the code but the old Fanuc controller does a good job of feeding through all these thousands of points smoothly. I really like Fanuc control on a mill, so I&#8217;ve accumulated a few of them over the years, this one being my oldest but probably my favorite. I&#8217;m spinning the cutter at 6,000 RPM (as fast as the old pig will run) and feeding it at 4IPM so I don&#8217;t break the tiny cutter. The depth of cut is about .003&#8221; though I vary the depth a little to simulate variations in width of a written signature such as where I cross the &#8220;T&#8221;. I also cut the steel type, A2, using a standard font. Feeding this slow it takes about a minute to do all the engraving. It would be faster to stamp it, but I think this is a nice touch. I used to use a high speed air spindle for this, but it is a bit of a bother to setup and honestly this old VMC doesn&#8217;t do much of anything in a real hurry regardless so I just take my time and feed it slow&#8230;

14_zpsfa6e68f2.jpg


Next I flip the part over keeping the same side of the work piece against the fixed jaw and putting the end surface that I just cut against the work stop and cut side two. These are two separate programs that I&#8217;ve stuck together with a programmed stop to flip the work so that both sides of the stock get cut before moving on to the next part.

15_zps3ee4ad3d.jpg


So, I&#8217;ve cut to final thickness, I&#8217;ve finished my flats, cut my pin holes and skeletonized the tang and cut the fullers and my mark. This concludes the first operation of this knife build. The next operation will be cutting the primary bevels. I have a few of these to run and it runs pretty slow so it will be a little while before I post the next bit.

Here is todays work against the old bayonet:

There is a knife in there somewhere...

fuller2_zpsdf9e99bc.jpg




Thanks for following along, I'll post more in a few days.
 
Last edited:
Psycho!!! Yet, I will be following this thread with great interest and you know than unsolicited comments will be forthcoming.;)
 
Unsolicited comment #1... Very cool! Can't wait to see where this goes next.
I think the signature looks nice being hand written on a machined piece. Gives it a human touch.
 
I love the details... I get a lot out of how others go about machining, their set-ups, tooling, etc. great!
 
I am neither a machinist nor a computer wiz. So on both fronts this thread fascinates me.

Thanks for putting this all together Nathan.

-Peter

I'm not a machinist, computer whiz or a competent knifemaker either and I live that I don't understand anything- means I get to learn now!

Instead of playdoh for the handles I have made multiple layer cardboard handles and with slightly damp hands see how the perspective handle feels. I get nowhere fast in making, but find that once the cardboard dries it is very set in shape and further resist deformation with later manipulations.


Thanks for showing how you achieve your precision!
 
Hmmm... It doesn't seem like the point is very sharp. I can bring an angle grinder over and sharpen up that point for you.


;) :D


Very cool stuff Nathan! And soooo shiny!!! :D
 
Hmmm... It doesn't seem like the point is very sharp. I can bring an angle grinder over and sharpen up that point for you.


;) :D


Very cool stuff Nathan! And soooo shiny!!! :D

Oh yeah, that'll be good, come on over. Then I can say it is a collaboration piece with Nick Wheeler. :thumbup:

You will see that I wait as long as I can to do the point. This is an area where I think the standard practice of finishing the profile before working on the bevels is all wrong. Everybody does it this way but I think there is a better way.

When grinding bevels (which I don't plan on doing much of on this particular pattern so it's not a great example) there is a tendency to get a little screwy at the tips. Everybody does it and we're all so used to seeing it that it doesn't even register but if you'll look at it critically, most blades (particularly pointy ones) lose some precision at the tip and round the spine over just a bit. This is so common that you will be hard pressed to find a blade that really stands up to close scrutiny here. If you will leave some meat on the back side of the blade behind the point while you're grinding the bevels and finish the profile only after the bevels are ground you will find the grind quality of your tips improve. I think that everybody ought to at least try this.

But yes, it won't become very pointy until I'm mostly done with it. None of my blades do.
 
Thanks Nathan, love your WIPs great lookin' blade, a question, have ya don't any folders yet?

I've done some basic folders for friends and family but I haven't had the time to work up a production pattern. It is on my to-do-list.
 
When grinding bevels (which I don't plan on doing much of on this particular pattern so it's not a great example) there is a tendency to get a little screwy at the tips. Everybody does it and we're all so used to seeing it that it doesn't even register but if you'll look at it critically, most blades (particularly pointy ones) lose some precision at the tip and round the spine over just a bit. This is so common that you will be hard pressed to find a blade that really stands up to close scrutiny here. If you will leave some meat on the back side of the blade behind the point while you're grinding the bevels and finish the profile only after the bevels are ground you will find the grind quality of your tips improve. I think that everybody ought to at least try this.

But yes, it won't become very pointy until I'm mostly done with it. None of my blades do.

I've been doing this all along, and I was wondering if I was crazy or something because I've never seen or heard of anyone else doing it like that. Certainly has made it easier for me, and it's great to know that you have been doing it all along.
 
I've been doing this all along, and I was wondering if I was crazy or something because I've never seen or heard of anyone else doing it like that. Certainly has made it easier for me, and it's great to know that you have been doing it all along.

I think Johnny Mac did a WIP a while back and he leaves a "tab" of material behind the point for this reason..
 
Many of you may not know this, but Nathan has 47.2387 "to-do-lists" arranged alpha-numerically and categorized by a classified algorithm that prioritizes tasks according to their Coefficient of Evil Genius, or CEG.

I laughed out loud. :D

I made a quick and dirty fixture for the next operation and trialed my program for it a couple minutes ago and pulled a dumb move that wrecked an endmill. 1st year apprentice type of mistake. I guess I'll post about it tomorrow. But I'm not feeling so genius at the moment. How about evil idiot... :D
 
When grinding bevels (which I don't plan on doing much of on this particular pattern so it's not a great example) there is a tendency to get a little screwy at the tips. Everybody does it and we're all so used to seeing it that it doesn't even register but if you'll look at it critically, most blades (particularly pointy ones) lose some precision at the tip and round the spine over just a bit. This is so common that you will be hard pressed to find a blade that really stands up to close scrutiny here. If you will leave some meat on the back side of the blade behind the point while you're grinding the bevels and finish the profile only after the bevels are ground you will find the grind quality of your tips improve. I think that everybody ought to at least try this.

I leave a little extra tab at the tip and finish the profile after finishing the bevels and after attaching the scales. That way you get a nice point and the scales fit perfectly.

When I sharpen my personal knives I also take a little off the spine at the tip. It give you some really really sharp tips.
 
Back
Top