I'm rather looking forward to your list too, Zaine! I can think of a handful of production knives that I consider to be at AFCKish quality. However, "within the same price range that are BETTER than the AFCK"? Considering 30% to be within the same price range (or even 50%), we have to drop the Emerson line, Microtech line, and the Sebenza, the least expensive of which is more than double the AFCK price. I can only think of two production knives in the same price range at remotely AFCK quality, off the top of my head.
But, to keep the ball rolling:
> 1. weak serrations
I must admit, I'm not a serration fan; I believe someone who picks the right sharpening strategy can get a plain edge to perform like a serration, no prob. So this is a don't-care for me personally. But my experience is Benchmade type serrations are stronger but less aggressive than Spyderco type. It's a tradeoff, I realize.
> 2. terrible opening quality
Here is where I wonder if we're living in parallel universes. I've handled dozens of AFCKs at shows, universally their action is incredibly good. EDI has the edge in this regard, but I'd rate AFCK opening action as "excellent" at WORST!
> 3. an unnecessarily expensive knife
$80 at discount for this kind of quality is unnecessarily expensive? Not to mention that cutting-wise, it'll outperform most all "tactical" folders, including many customs.
> 4. G-10 scales that fade to gray
This I haven't seen. How long did it take for yours to fade? My 2-3 year old miniAFCK hasn't faded, nor has my 8 month old AFCK.
> 5. a design that rips off everyone else's
Well, if the package works at a great price, I don't much care about this. Even so, I'm not sure it's true. Any knife with a Spyderco hole will look superficially like a Spyderco. But the blade shape is different from Spyderco's, the grind is different, and the inclusion of the forward rake is fairly unique. The handle is different, and exceptionally ergonomic. And I *think* the AFCK and 970 were the first production folders with g-10 scales + titanium liners. When you say "everyone", did you mean other production companies, or custom makers, or what? Let's look at this again in the context of the list of knives you give.
> 6. wobbly side-play in the blade
In yours, do you mean? I have read about this problem from time to time in the Benchmade Forum, so I know it happens occasionally, but I've not really seen it myself with AFCKs I've played with at shows. When it does occur, Benchmade seems to be reasonably responsive at fixing it.
> 7. weak liner lock that overextends
Okay, you know me, I'm carrying on a one-man campaign against liner locks. Far be it from me to defend a liner lock. However, the AFCK has one of the *most* reliable liner locks in my collection. When I play with knives at shows, I can often pop liner locks just with hand pressure, but normally not with the AFCK. I've always considered the AFCK one of the exceptions that proves the rule about liner lock problems. Have you really been popping your lock, and how many samples of this have you seen?
Joe
jat@cup.hp.com
[This message has been edited by Joe Talmadge (edited 17 November 1998).]