Well, you should read the thread and get your FACTS straight before you start posting stuff that is untrue too. I mean, it's fine for you to speak of your experience with Andre. But to post and make points on details that have already been established, as if they were the truth, on two other peoples experiences is ridiculous. Andre's own words and actions has already shown what type of person he really is, NOT the "aw shucks, good guy" picture that you and @thegunnerd are trying to paint.
CRKDMike wrote:
"You made custom order requests and assumed a midtech price."
I think this has been covered several times already and I have posted the exact message exchange between myself and Andre VERBATIM. I did not "assume" anything, so check your FACTS. I ordered and detailed those options in a message to Andre along with a photo of the knife, also in the Paypal notes. Andre confirmed. Period, end of story.
"In my experience, I contacted Andre directly through facebook asking about one of the knives I saw on his page. He explained in his first reply what was included for $450, and what was extra."
This did not occur with either myself, or the message exchanges that I've seen Tomalock post. In fact, it's the opposite with the intention to mislead. Again, never mentioned anything as being an upgrade when talking about available options AND he confirmed my order. What more is there to say? I hope you're not insinuating that we are lying. Again, ask yourself, how much sense does it make that we try to get "upgrades" for free so that we can piss off the maker and ultimately NOT end up with knives that we really wanted.
"There is a good chance that diplomacy was neglected on BOTH sides of this transaction. I don't know about you guys, but if I have sent someone $450, I'm going to be pretty nice to them until I get either my money back, or the product I purchased."
Diplomacy was CERTAINLY practiced on my end and DEFINITELY not on Andre's end, so for you to say that it was neglected by me without processing the FACTS that have been detailed is offensive. I was 100% cordial and friendly with Andre until he decided to quit responding to me. At that point, I did use profanity in a message to him asking for my refund. He was not responding, yet I was completely cordial in asking him to confirm my order details. I used some profanity and it seemed to work as I finally did get a response from him. Beyond that, I later messaged and apologized for the profanity and explained that it was, in part, because he was not responding to my messages. Yes, I wish I did not use profanity and I apologized for that -- DIPLOMACY. Andre back out of his committment on an order he confirmed, never refunded my money (that he suggested), ignored my messages inquiring about my refund, and asked me to post to his Facebook page stating that everything was worked out in exchange for the balance of my refund, which he never followed through on -- NEGLECTED DIPLOMACY
"Think about how many messages Andre gets a day, and think about how he may overlook certain details of an order. Give him the benefit of the doubt..."
I think that point has been spoken to in this thread already. I am not an asshole and if someone makes an innocent mistake, I'm totally ok with that. If Andre decides not to make good on the mistake that HE made, that's fine. But to turn it around on your customer and say "what, you want options for free?" is a douche-bag move, even if it was an innocent mistake to begin with (which it wasn't in my case, or from what I've seen neiher in Tomalock's case). Beyond that, again, explain to me why, if he decides the right thing to do is not honor his own "innocent mistake", why it is ok for him to a) blame the customer for trying to get "free upgrades" b) not respond to their messages c) not refund their money? Please explain your view on that CRKDMike
What happened here is obviously unfortunate, but for everyone to avoid buying a knife that they like, just because the maker didn't make a great impression on one or two other members of this forum is pretty strange to me.
That is your opinion. I think I clearly stated in an earlier post that some people just don't care about the character of a maker, and I could care less. But to say that other people are strange for caring that the knife they carry is from someone who has integrity is bullshit. The knives that I own are personal to me. How about if I said it was strange that you DIDN'T care about a maker's character and that all you cared about was the current and future value of the knife you own? I question a little bit if that isn't the real basis behind your post. Afterall, you do own at least one of his knives now and so you do have at least a little bit of a vested interest in this, maybe not as much as Thegunnerd, but again, what do I have to possibly gain from this?
"...I would pretty much kiss his arse..."
I think this illustrates the difference between someone like yourself and someone like me. I think that's the whole point of why "strange" people, as you call them, care about the knives they carry. It's called SELF RESPECT.
Bottom line is, Andre has shown through his own words and actions (and inactions) the man he truly is. Since all you really have to offer is "I didn't get screwed", I don't really expect you to empathize with me or Tomalock, but let's just stick to the facts here. The most telling fact is quoting what Andre says himself... "game ON"