As a company, I think Schrade does have *some* nice looking, value oriented designs - that I won't be buying - but CT's "design" is NOT one of them. Without trashing the "designer" and not ever likely to handle the knife, here's what I see that would be a no go for me. First, the handle is too long for the size of the blade. Has anyone tried to chop two handed? Difficult at best even with a proper sword. Even swords from the middle ages were wielded one handed. Second: maybe the pinkie hook at the rear of the handle would be OK, but that design mess at the guard is fugly and useless on a chopper, as the mass of the blade is trying to pull out of your hand. At least with the King you can choke up and do some fine stuff, too. Third: the blade is too short. Especially for a "chopper" with that handle. Grind needs to be higher....witness the Brute and you'll see what I mean. Finally, my thoughts on design are this: elements of the design should have a purpose, or they're just cluttering up the thing. Anyone can call themselves a "designer", but that does not make it so.....and regardless of my personal feelings about said designer, I don't care for the design of this knife, and I don't feel the need to check it out. OTOH, I held an inexpensive "Brush Demon" designed by Jerry Hossom, and even though the build quality was....inexpensive looking....the knife felt GREAT in hand and I could immediately tell the guy who designed it knew what he was doing. I know Ethan's knives go through a lot of real world testing before AND after maunufacturing.....how many protos d'ya think there were of this Schrade before it went into production, and how many people tested those prototypes? And that's all I'm saying.