What? I have been under the impression that Kershaw and ZT's parent company is overseas. Do I have the wrong information?
Actually, you have correct information.
Having contacted and dealt with Kershaw / KAI HQ up in Oregon for customer service in the past, I believed that they were a US company, which is actually true and as I said, USA based. Your question however made me look it up to fact check - and we are both correct, though I bow to your interpretation in one very important respect.
Here is the straight - albeit long winded story.
Kershaw and ZT are brands owned and operated by
KAI USA Limited. Which is a USA Company. All ZT's are reportedly made in the USA up in Oregon, and many of the Kershaw line of knives are US made in Oregon as well. Of the 9 Kershaw's I own, only my Leek is made in the USA. For those that care, the Link, Dividend, Blur, and Launch are some of the other USA made Kershaw's. I correctly stated that Kershaw made some knives here in the USA, but had farmed out others overseas. That is true, along with the fact that they are owned by a USA based company, also true.
The rub comes - to what saber cat is referring to - in the fact that
KAI USA Ltd. is owned by parent company,
KAI Group Worldwide which is headquartered in Tokyo Japan. KAI Group owns several of companies, mostly in the far east as well as 1 each in Germany and France. So while
KAI USA Ltd is a US company, it's owner is not. So in strict definitions, saber cat is correct. The overall owner of Kershaw and ZT is in fact a Japanese based company.
So like my earlier post, saying Steel Will was a US company who is manufacturing their knives overseas (in Italy and China),
KAI Group Worldwide is a Japanese company making knives in the USA, through their US company subsidiary. All of which adds up to what is referred to as "Globalization", defined as , the process by which businesses or other organizations develop international influence or start operating on an international scale. All of which distills down to the fact that the lines separating foreign and domestic are getting blurrier all the time. Little is black and white any more. So if one wants to say knives stamped made in china, are chinese knives, then knives stamped made in the USA are USA knives, regardless of who owns the overall company that is making and marketing the knife. It is a perfectly reasonable definition. But not necessarily an accurate one in many respects.
It has always irked me when people make a big deal out of their "buying American" and supporting "American jobs", elevating such a stance almost to the level of a patriotic duty. Problem with that perspective is tons of american jobs and investment are centered around "foreign" companies. Refusing to buy a Toyota affects the local dealer down the street - who is most often an American business man and all his American employees - the transit companies who got the car to the dealer, and oftentimes, the US factory where that car was actually made, all american jobs they are refusing to support by refusing to buy an Import. Mazda is partially owned by Ford. Last I heard, Ford owned 30% of Mazda. Also, in a related article this past January in Forbes Magazine, Foreign car manufacturers are making more cars in the USA than GM, Ford and all other US Manufacturers. So that imported car isn't imported anymore. And not buying "imported" means you are not supporting american manufacturing jobs after all, if that is truly, your intent. Here is a link to that article.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrob...w-making-more-cars-in-u-s-than-u-s-companies/
As already noted, ZT is American manufactured, but ultimately foreign owned. So are you really "Buying American" if the profits end up in Japan? I just asking the question, not taking a stance. Likewise, could Steel Will actually be considered buying American because they are USA based even though all their manufacturing is overseas? Not taking a stance on any of this, just pointing out that the world is not as cut and dried and simple as some wish to believe.
All of which only serves to further invalidate the OP's original question of "
Are all non US knives garbage? " The obvious answer is no, of course not.
But it also begs the more complicated question of "how do you define US Knives"? Place of manufacture? Place of Parent Company HQ? Place of operating company HQ? Percentage of product line made in the USA? Assembled in USA? Designed in the USA? Manufactured from USA provided and made steel or other raw materials? What defines a US Knife? I think to be honest, many define
"US made" out of convenience or some arbitrary manner that supports their own bias as opposed to a set, agreed upon definition of the term. But I could be wrong. Maybe it does just boil down to the "Made in..." stamp on the blade.
Like I said, long winded. lol