Admittedly, I've yet to read the entire thread, so if my answer seems ill timed I'll apologize in advance.....
I basically consider the moniker of a collector, super collector, serious collector etc... to be determined by their knowledge in the products they are buying and their participation within the industry. This pretty much covers any industry where "collectibles" are made today....
I honestly don't believe that you can limit a person's validity or stature as a "avid collector" by the amount they spend, but that seems to be where the battle line is drawn... I know guys that simply don't have the money to spend on vast collections, but they have the knowledge and experience to surpass quite a few folks...
It's kind of a hard determination, but after all the shows I've gone to and all the years I've spent in this industry, I've learned to NEVER discount someone standing in front of your table... The guy who looks like Gomer Pyle may be the foremost expert in the field of Combat Knives under _____ inches but larger than _____ inches and you'd have no clue...
I guess the gist of what I'm saying is that the status of a maker/collector/dealer etc... shouldn't be determined by monetary resources... It's not a coincidence that the guys who make more money tend to have nicer shit...
Guys who are at the top of their game (knife collectors, makers, dealers etc...) generally don't announce it to the world, so this is an industry where legends are lurking about.....everywhere.... That's part of what makes it so great...
What I said above is just general rambling, so it's not meant to slight anyone or refute anything anyone said on here.... Just wanted to make sure I put a vanilla wrapper on it....
MT