WarRaven said:
"Flawed" But i bought one anyways.
LMAO
Well, I hope you don't have a mouthful of soda when you read this- I wouldn't want to be responsible for ruining your keyboard.

Yeah, I bought the knife because I was still pleased enough
on the whole. I didn't like the thick edge geometry either. Still bought it. Didn't like the edges around the handle. Bought it anyway. Didn't like the use of those tiny torx screws that you can't find a driver for. Still laid down my cash for the knife. Didn't really care for the pink/black color combo on the handle. (this was before they came out with the green/black version) Bought it anyway. I would have liked to try the design with M2 steel instead of 154 CM. And ya know what? I still bought the knife despite all my nit picking, because overall it was about the closest thing to what I was wanting. I have a whole pile of factory knives, and nearly every one of them has been modified in some way to better suit my tastes and needs, because nothing is perfect. This is funny?
WarRaven said:
They may have had poor spring steel to begin with an poorly channeled scales at first, but these i believe have been adressed by BM enough that this is not a problem anymore.
Well, I certainly hope you're right. I don't have any experience with their latest production. But just for reference, those threads I linked spanned over 3 1/2 years, and more people have chimed in here with failure stories. (don't know for sure when they actually happened though.) So did they take over 3 years to change the design, or did they make up a gigantic batch of springs with bad steel 3 years ago that they're still using up?
WarRaven said:
Flawed design, Omg.
Whether it is a coil,leaf or torsion,they all suffer from fatigue an fail at some point. Does this make them Flawed, no i dont think so.
I know springs will eventually fail from fatigue, and I agree with you that this in itself does not make them flawed. There is also nothing wrong with searching for something better.
WarRaven said:
So, they have told thousands of people about how bad the design of the spring is, did they mention the companys willingness to help fix thier knife an get them cutting again without alot of grief,not that i have seen, or even matter now does it?
Yes, I have given them credit for promptly fixing my knife, several times now. The fact remains, it would have been even nicer if it never broke in the first place.
WarRaven said:
I would also add, that from a companies point of view, it would be best to move on to a new design if your present one was causing problems to your end customers an losing credibilty amongst them, and i would hazzard, they would know that best, at least better then some guy that owns one or two and is making a ruckus over it here.
Hey man, maybe they do know better. All I'm doing here is voicing my dissenting opinion in a sea of praise. As I mentioned, there are litterally hundreds of threads that say the springs are nothing to worry about. Which is largely why I'm being so vocal. Along these same lines, I wonder if Mr. Glesser would be willing to chime in and mention how many/what percentage of ball bearing locks they've had returned with broken coil springs. I'm betting that the number is very low.
so again i wonder, how do YOU come up with it's a poorly designed spring.... to State it is a poor design, is an absolutely clueless statement... I see this as troll'ish type of behavoir.
The condescending attitude is not needed here. I agree that this entire issue has blown up far bigger than I intended; I should not have made such a flippant remark that could be misunderstood. But- I have been able to state my case without personal attacks, and I supported my position with plenty of other people's real experiences. I am open to discussion as long as it's based on logic instead of insults.
Good day to you, sir.